Clinical evaluation of multiple sclerosis:: quantification by use of scales

被引:6
|
作者
Izquierdo, G [1 ]
Ruiz-Peña, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Virgen Macarena, Serv Neurol, Unidad Esclerosis, E-41009 Seville, Spain
关键词
clinical evaluation; cognitive impairment; EDSS; fatigue; multiple sclerosis; functional composite; scales;
D O I
10.33588/rn.3602.2002350
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Clinical evaluation is indispensable in multiple sclerosis (MS)for the quantitative measurement of the extent of the disorder, which is in turn required to find out how the disease is evolving and the influence the different forms of treatment are having on it, both in the experimental phase and in the usual monitoring they are subjected to. Method We review the different scales that are used to evaluate the distinct symptomatic and functional aspects of MS and the repercussions these have on the extent of disability displayed in the patient's social and personal life. Although in recent years, the EDSS has been an essential, irreplaceable scale in MS, other instruments of measurement that complement it have also begun to appear. The fatigue, cognitive function and quality of life scales are being used more and more frequently. The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite is an instrument that is used more and more frequently in MS and has proved to be highly sensitive in the evaluation of very important clinical trials. Conclusions. The lack of correlation between the distinct scales corroborates the fact that they measure complementary aspects of MS.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical scales for multiple sclerosis
    Sharrack, B
    Hughes, RAC
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 135 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [2] THE USE OF MAGNITUDE SCALES IN THE QUANTIFICATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
    ODEALMEIDA, N
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEROS DE PSICOLOGIA, 1986, 38 (01): : 58 - 72
  • [3] Use of composite scares in the quantification of deterioration in multiple sclerosis
    Lienert, C
    Lechner-Scott, J
    Schött, D
    Constantinescu, C
    Kappos, L
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 1999, 5 (04): : 220 - 222
  • [5] Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: clinical and self-report scales
    R. F. Neuteboom
    A. C. J. W. Janssens
    T. A. M. Siepman
    I. A. Hoppenbrouwers
    I. A. Ketelslegers
    N. Jafari
    E. A. P. Steegers
    C. J. M. de Groot
    R. Q. Hintzen
    Journal of Neurology, 2012, 259 : 311 - 317
  • [6] Clinical outcome measures and rating scales in multiple sclerosis trials
    Wingerchuk, DM
    Noseworthy, JH
    Weinshenker, BG
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 72 (11) : 1070 - 1079
  • [7] The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis
    Sharrack, B
    Hughes, RAC
    Soudain, S
    Dunn, G
    BRAIN, 1999, 122 : 141 - 159
  • [8] Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: clinical and self-report scales
    Neuteboom, R. F.
    Janssens, A. C. J. W.
    Siepman, T. A. M.
    Hoppenbrouwers, I. A.
    Ketelslegers, I. A.
    Jafari, N.
    Steegers, E. A. P.
    de Groot, C. J. M.
    Hintzen, R. Q.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 259 (02) : 311 - 317
  • [9] Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: clinical and self-report scales
    Neuteboom, R. F.
    Janssens, A. C. J. W.
    Siepman, T. A. M.
    Hoppenbrouwers, I. A.
    Ketelslegers, I. A.
    Jafari, N.
    Steegers, E. A. P.
    De Groot, C. J. M.
    Hintzen, R. Q.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2011, 17 : S485 - S485
  • [10] Quantification and clinical relevance of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a review
    Grassiot, Blandine
    Desgranges, Beatrice
    Eustache, Francis
    Defer, Gilles
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 256 (09) : 1397 - 1412