Can public access to documents support the transparency of automated decision-making? The European Union law perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Mazur, Joanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Law & Adm, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Digital Econ Lab DELab, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
automated decision-making; General Data Protection Regulation; right to access public documents; right to access information; Regulation; 1049/2001; transparency; DATA PROTECTION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1093/ijlit/eaaa019
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Due to the concerns which are raised regarding the impact of automated decision-making (ADM) on transparency and their potential discriminatory character, it is worth examining the possibility of applying legal measures which could serve to increase transparency of ADM systems. The article explores the possibility to consider algorithms used in ADM systems as documents subjected to the right to access documents in European Union (EU) law. It is focused on contrasting and comparing the approach based on the right to access public documents developed by the Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) with the approach to the right to access public information as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The analysis shows discrepancies in the perspectives presented by these Courts which result in a limited scope of the right to access public documents in EU law. Pointing out these differences may provide a motivation to clarify the meaning of the right to access information in EU law, the CJEU's approach remaining as for now incoherent. The article presents the arguments for and ways of bringing together the approaches of the CJEU and the ECtHR in the light of a decreasing level of transparency resulting from the use of ADM in the public sector. It shows that in order to ensure compliance with EU law, it is necessary to rethink the role which the right to access information plays in the human rights catalogue.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated Decision-Making Systems as a Challenge for Effective Legal Protection in European Union Law
    Mazur, Joanna
    EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW, 2021, 46 (02) : 194 - 210
  • [2] Decision-making in the European Union
    Steinbauer, F
    OSTERREICHISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT, 2000, 29 (01): : 117 - 118
  • [3] Decision-making in the European Union
    Manners, I
    JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2001, 39 (02): : 366 - 367
  • [4] Decision-making in the European Union
    Lloyd, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2000, 55 (03): : 523 - 523
  • [5] Decision-making in the European Union
    Flynn, R
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2001, 30 : 585 - 587
  • [6] Decision-making in the European Union
    Delmartino, F
    POLITICAL STUDIES, 2002, 50 (04) : 863 - 865
  • [7] Transparency in public health decision-making
    Garcia-Altes, Anna
    Argimon, Josep M.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2016, 30 : 9 - 13
  • [8] Drugs and decision-making in the European Union
    Polonskaya, Yana Vladimirovna
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY STUDIES, 2007, 5 (01): : 133 - 139
  • [9] The role and impact of the European the transparency of decision-making
    Söderman, J
    OPENNESS AND TRANSPARENCY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, 1998, : 75 - 83
  • [10] Automated decision-making in public administration
    Monarcha-Matlak, Aleksandra
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 2077 - 2084