First-trimester Aneuploidy Screening Is There a Maternal Age at Which It Loses Effectiveness?

被引:0
|
作者
Lau, Gregory W. [1 ]
Feldman, Daniele S. [1 ]
Morales, Carlos M. [1 ]
Smith, Deebra [1 ]
Edwards, Rennatha [1 ]
Williams, John, III [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
advanced maternal age; aneuploidy; chromosomal abnormality; first trimester screening; nuchal translucency; prenatal diagnosis; Trisomy; 13; 18; 21; DOWN-SYNDROME; AMNIOCENTESIS; RISK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine the maternal age at which the likelihood of a screen-positive result justifies diagnostic testing. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of women who presented for first-trimester screening using nuchal translucency (NT) measurements with or without serum biochemistry between January 2000December 2011. Using cutoffs of 1:300, 1:270, and 1:200, the Trisomy 21 (T21) screen-positive rates were stratified by maternal age. RESULTS: A total of 6,927 women underwent first-trimester screening; women with multiple gestations and/or using donor oocytes were excluded. Of the remaining women, 4,882 had combined NT and biochemistry results, while 1,767 had NT without serum screening results. Screen-positive rates were stratified by maternal age. An increase in the screen-positive rate is noted for both groups after age 40 but is more pronounced after age 43, where the screen-positive rate is 97.8% and 63.0% using cutoffs of 1:300 for the NT and NT and Biochemistry groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Women undergoing first-trimester screening at age 40 have approximately 30% likelihood of screening positive for T21. This rate increases to roughly 7090% at age 44. This information will affect the counseling of patients who are considering prenatal screening versus diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 447
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] First-trimester screening for aneuploidy
    Brigatti, KW
    Malone, FD
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (01) : 1 - +
  • [2] First-trimester translucency: Aneuploidy, sonographic findings, and maternal age
    MahieuCaputo, D
    Dommergues, M
    MorichonDelvallez, N
    Aubry, MC
    Wekemans, M
    Dumez, Y
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1996, 11 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [3] Cost effectiveness of first trimester aneuploidy screening in obese women of advanced maternal age
    Griffin, Emily
    Lee, Vanessa
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S313 - S314
  • [4] Should the first-trimester aneuploidy screen be maternal age adjusted? Screening by absolute risk versus risk adjusted to maternal age
    Gebb, Juliana
    Dar, Pe'er
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (03) : 245 - 247
  • [5] First-trimester screening for aneuploidy by nuchal translucency
    Zoppi, MA
    Ibba, RM
    Monni, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) : 1590 - 1591
  • [6] First-trimester screening for preeclampsia: impact of maternal parity on modeling and screening effectiveness
    Moon, Myoungjin
    Odibo, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (17): : 2028 - 2033
  • [7] Ethical Dimensions of First-trimester Fetal Aneuploidy Screening
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 57 (01): : 226 - 231
  • [8] Nuchal translucency as a method of first-trimester screening for aneuploidy
    Naidoo, Poovangela
    Erasmus, Ilsa
    Jeebodh, Jayshree
    Nicolaou, Ermos
    van Gelderen, Cyril J.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 98 (04): : 295 - 299
  • [9] Patients' preferences regarding first-trimester aneuploidy screening
    Sharma, G
    Chasen, ST
    Gold, HT
    Alt, AK
    McCullough, L
    Chervenak, FA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 73S - 73S
  • [10] First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: Research or standard of care?
    Malone, FD
    Berkowitz, RL
    Canick, JA
    D'Alton, ME
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (03) : 490 - 496