Policy-relevant program evaluation in a national substance abuse treatment system

被引:12
|
作者
Humphreys, K
Hamilton, EG
Moos, RH
Suchinsky, RT
机构
[1] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Menlo Pk Div 152, Program Evaluat & Resource Ctr, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[2] Rand Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90406 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, Mental Hlth Strateg Hlth Grp, Addict Disorders Dept, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02790501
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article discusses recent trends in public and private substance abuse services and offers suggestions on how the evaluation of such services can inform clinical practice and policy making. This analysis focuses particularly on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which operates the largest substance abuse treatment system in the United States. In recent years, there has been an erosion of services for substance abuse outside the VA. In contrast, due to increased funding from the U.S. Congress, the VA significantly expanded substance abuse treatment from 1990 to 1994. However; efforts to "reinvent" and downsize government initiated a reversal of this growth trend in 1994, and VA services may shrink further as the system becomes more decentralized and adopts managed care strategies from the private sector Drawing from the VA Program Evaluation and Resource Center's (PERC) experience of evaluating the VA system and working with federal policy makers, this article presents examples and suggestions for making evaluations of substance abuse treatment systems more useful in policy discussions and in day-to-day clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 385
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Policy-relevant program evaluation in a national substance abuse treatment system
    Keith Humphreys
    Eric G. Hamilton
    Rudolf H. Moos
    Richard T. Suchinsky
    [J]. The journal of mental health administration, 1997, 24 : 373 - 385
  • [2] Policy-relevant treatment effects
    Heckman, JJ
    Vytlacil, E
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (02): : 107 - 111
  • [3] CONTENT VALIDITY IN EVALUATION AND POLICY-RELEVANT RESEARCH
    MARK, MM
    SINCLAIR, RC
    BENSON, GL
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 1985, 8 (02) : 87 - 91
  • [4] Reply to Hornbrook on doing policy-relevant evaluation research
    Feldman, P
    Latimer, E
    Davidson, H
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 1997, 32 (01) : 123 - 125
  • [5] Estimation of policy-relevant reference conditions throughout national river networks
    Stoffels, Rick J.
    Booker, Doug J.
    Franklin, Paul A.
    Snelder, Ton H.
    Clapcott, Joanne E.
    Fragaszy, Stephen R.
    Wagenhoff, Annika
    Hickey, Chris W.
    [J]. METHODSX, 2021, 8
  • [6] Evaluation of a jail-based substance abuse treatment program
    Hughey, R
    Klemke, LW
    [J]. FEDERAL PROBATION, 1996, 60 (04) : 40 - 44
  • [7] A Scoping Review of Data Sources for the Conduct of Policy-Relevant Substance Use Research
    Geissler, Kimberley H.
    Evans, Elizabeth A.
    Johnson, Julie K.
    Whitehill, Jennifer M.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2022, 137 (05) : 944 - 954
  • [8] Family-focused substance abuse treatment: A program evaluation
    McComish, JF
    Greenberg, R
    Ager, J
    Essenmacher, L
    Orgain, LS
    Bacik, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 2003, 35 (03) : 321 - 331
  • [9] AN INFORMATION-SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT EVALUATION IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE
    BUHRINGER, G
    MAI, N
    [J]. ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 1979, 3 (04) : 469 - 479
  • [10] CULTURALLY RELEVANT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE TREATMENT
    ZWEBEN, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 1993, 25 (01) : 1 - 2