A TWO-PHASED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE BEST SMARTPHONE

被引:13
|
作者
Yildiz, A. [1 ]
Ergul, E. U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Dept Automot Engn, Fac Technol, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Amasya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Fac Technol, Amasya, Turkey
来源
关键词
ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PROCESS ANP; CHOQUET; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.7166/26-3-1208
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the last 20 years, rapid and significant developments have occurred in communication and information technologies. In parallel with these developments, the importance of smartphones has increased. In addition, many smartphone manufacturers have launched and continue to launch a number of new models with many features. People who want to buy a new smartphone have difficulties selecting the best smartphone among the numerous models available on the technology markets. Therefore, smartphone selection has become a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem for people. Hence, decision-making processes will be facilitated by using MCDM methods, and these will provide the most appropriate decision. In this paper, the best smartphone among the 28 alternatives determined by the person who will buy them are selected by using three main criteria and 17 sub-criteria with the help of a two-phased MCDM approach. In the first phase, 28 smartphone alternatives are ranked using the analytic network process (ANP). In the second phase, a model that includes the best four alternatives of ANP is created. Afterwards, the best smartphone is selected using the generalised Choquet integral (GCI) method according to this model. Finally, the findings and the results are given.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 215
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria decision-making approach for selecting a structural system of an industrial facility
    Zumrut, Irem Bayram
    Baran, Hamim Burak
    Ozbalta, Turkan Goksal
    [J]. ORGANIZATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 14 (01): : 2656 - 2665
  • [2] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Selecting a Maturity Model
    dos Santos-Neto, Joao Batista Sarmento
    Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [3] Selecting the Best Flood Flow Frequency Model Using Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making
    Osman Mohammadpour
    Yousef Hassanzadeh
    Ahmad Khodadadi
    Bahram Saghafian
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 3957 - 3974
  • [4] Selecting the Best Flood Flow Frequency Model Using Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making
    Mohammadpour, Osman
    Hassanzadeh, Yousef
    Khodadadi, Ahmad
    Saghafian, Bahram
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (12) : 3957 - 3974
  • [5] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Selecting Wind Energy Power Plant Locations
    Rehman, Ateekh Ur
    Abidi, Mustufa Haider
    Umer, Usama
    Usmani, Yusuf Siraj
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [7] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [8] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    [J]. 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [9] Fuzzy Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Selecting & Evaluating of AMT
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Zhang, Weiwei
    [J]. ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 3163 - 3170
  • [10] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482