Open vs Minimally Invasive Approach for Emergent Colectomy in Perforated Diverticulitis

被引:12
|
作者
Monzavi, Carlos A. Esparza [1 ]
Naffouje, Samer A. [2 ]
Chaudhry, Vivek [3 ,4 ]
Nordenstam, Johan [3 ]
Mellgren, Anders [3 ]
Gantt, Gerald, Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[4] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Diverticulitis; Hartmann procedure; Minimally invasive surgery; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; Open surgery; Primary anastomosis; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; SURGERY FOLLOWING COLECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; RISK-FACTORS; POPULATION; SWEDEN; CANCER; PROCTOCOLECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001805
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis has been managed with an open approach, with a Hartmann procedure or a colectomy with primary anastomosis. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with postoperative advantages in the elective setting and may show a benefit in the emergent setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive approaches for emergent perforated diverticulitis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database using propensity score matching. SETTINGS: Interventions were performed in hospitals participating in the national database. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent emergent colectomy from 2012 to 2017 were included. Procedures were divided into Hartmann procedure and primary anastomosis. Open vs minimally invasive groups were defined by intention to treat. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes measures included length of stay and overall morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of 130,616 patients, 7105 met inclusion criteria (4486 Hartmann procedure and 2619 primary anastomosis). A total of 1989 open Hartmann procedure cases were matched to 663 minimally invasive cases. The minimally invasive group underwent longer operations and had lower rates of respiratory failure. There were no differences in overall complications, mortality, length of stay, or home discharge. In the primary anastomosis group, 1027 cases were matched 1:1. The minimally invasive approach was associated with longer operative times, but reduced wound dehiscence, sepsis, bleeding, overall complications, and length of stay. No difference was detected in anastomotic leak, mortality, reoperation, or readmission rates. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include retrospective nature, data loss, nonuniformity, selection bias, and coding errors. CONCLUSIONS: Emergent minimally invasive primary anastomosis results in a shorter length of stay and decreased 30-day morbidity in comparison with open primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis. Emergent open and minimally invasive Hartmann procedures for perforated diverticulitis have comparable outcomes, perhaps because of a 40% conversion rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B421.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH FOR EMERGENT COLECTOMY IN PERFORATED DIVERTICULITIS.
    Monzavi, C. A. Esparza
    Naffouje, S.
    Gantt, G.
    Chaudhry, V.
    Nordenstam, J.
    Mellgren, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E305 - E306
  • [2] Open Versus Minimally Invasive Emergent Colectomy for Diverticulitis
    Le, Nguyen K.
    Cho, Nam Yong
    Mallick, Saad
    Chervu, Nikhil
    Kim, Shineui
    Sakowitz, Sara
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Hanjoo
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2024, 90 (10) : 2560 - 2569
  • [3] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Colectomy for Perforated Diverticulitis
    Moghadamyeghaneh, Zhobin
    Talus, Henry
    Fitzgerald, Simon
    Muthusamy, Muthukumar
    Stamos, Michael J.
    Roudnitsky, Valery
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2021, 87 (04) : 561 - 567
  • [4] OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE COLECTOMY FOR PERFORATED DIVERTICULITIS
    Moghadamyeghaneh, Zhobin
    Talus, Henry
    Stamos, Michael J.
    Roudnitsky, Valery
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S1483 - S1483
  • [5] Letter re: "Open Versus Minimally Invasive Emergent Colectomy for Diverticulitis"
    Dadhwal, Uday Singh
    Shamsudeen, Mohamed Arsath
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2025, 91 (03) : 455 - 456
  • [6] Emergent colectomy for colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of open vs. minimally invasive approach
    Jecius, Hunter
    Khurrum, Muhammad
    Krall, Erika
    Tso, Dynnika
    Pefok, Afang
    Silva, Ryan
    Wusterbarth, Emily
    Arif, Hina
    Hamidi, Mohammad
    Nfonsam, Valentine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 225 (04): : 724 - 727
  • [7] EMERGENT COLECTOMY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH.
    Jecius, H.
    Krall, E.
    Tso, D.
    Hanna, K.
    Hamidi, M.
    Nfonsam, V.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E412 - E412
  • [8] Letter re: Response to Letter to the Editor Re: Open Versus Minimally Invasive Emergent Colectomy for Diverticulitis
    Le, Nguyen K.
    Cho, Nam Yong
    Mallick, Saad
    Chervu, Nikhil
    Kim, Shineui
    Sakowitz, Sara
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Hanjoo
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2025,
  • [9] Laparoscopic Versus Open Emergent Sigmoid Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis
    Yongjin F. Lee
    Rebecca F. Brown
    Michael Battaglia
    Robert K. Cleary
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2020, 24 : 1173 - 1182
  • [10] Laparoscopic Versus Open Emergent Sigmoid Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis
    Lee, Yongjin F.
    Brown, Rebecca F.
    Battaglia, Michael
    Cleary, Robert K.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (05) : 1173 - 1182