Involution and symbiosis: the self-perpetuating conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Literature on conflict duration emphasizes the importance of material factors, commitment problems and information asymmetries. Using the case study of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and drawing on interviews with 138 sources involved in the conflict, this article advances a theory of conflict duration that highlights the role that interests, identities and the social anchorage of belligerents play. Together, they explain how the conflict in the Congo has become an end in itself for belligerents, carried forward by its own momentum. This article describes the key factors: a proliferation of actors, the rise of a military bourgeoisie, the involution of interests, and the symbiosis of belligerents. A similar argument can be applied to other protracted conflicts in large and weak states. This understanding of conflict has repercussions for policy, as it suggests that there is no inherent link between elite political settlements and stability. It pushes away from the technocratic approach to institution-building to centre the role of the state and political culture in debates over peacebuilding. Using the case-study of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, this article argues that, contrary to popular belief, the duration of a conflict is impacted by interests, identities and the social anchorage of belligerents. Therefore, conflict can become an end in itself for combatants, carried forward by its own momentum.