Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009-2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals

被引:41
|
作者
Luo, Xuyao [1 ]
Liang, Zhimin [1 ]
Gong, Feng [1 ]
Bao, Hongwei [1 ]
Huang, Li [1 ]
Jia, Zhiwei [2 ]
机构
[1] CPLA, Hosp 411, Dept Orthopaed, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Grad Sch, 800 Xiangyin Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Foot and ankle research; Bibliometric analysis; NATIONAL REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-015-0070-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Significant growth has been observed in the field of foot and ankle research in recent years. However, bibliometric studies concerning the quantity and quality of articles published in foot and ankle journals are scarce. This study aimed to reveal the characteristics of national productivity in the field of foot and ankle research and to provide a general picture of foot and ankle research for surgeons and researchers. Methods: Web of Science was searched for foot and ankle articles in 4 highly cited journals from 2009 to 2013. The number of total articles and citations were collected to evaluate the contribution of different countries. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size and gross domestic product (GDP). Results: A total number of 2083 articles were published worldwide. North America, West Europe, Australia and East Asia were the most productive world regions. High income countries published 90.35% of articles, middle-income 9.60%, and low-income just 0.05%. The United States published the largest number of articles (1025/2083, 49.2%), followed by the United Kingdom (221/2083, 10.6%), Australia (92/2083, 4.4%), and had the highest total citations (3631). However, Canada had the highest average citations per article (5.0), followed by Australia (4.6) and Switzerland (4.2). There were positive correlations between the total number of publications and population/GDP (p < 0.01). When normalized to population size, Switzerland ranked the highest, followed by Australia, and the United Kingdom. When adjusted for GDP, Switzerland ranked the highest, followed by United Kingdom, and South Korea. Conclusions: The United States is the most productive country in the field of foot and ankle research. However, Australia, some smaller European and Asian countries may be more productive relative to their size.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals
    Xuyao Luo
    Zhimin Liang
    Feng Gong
    Hongwei Bao
    Li Huang
    Zhiwei Jia
    [J]. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 8
  • [2] Worldwide productivity in the hand and wrist literature: A bibliometric analysis of four highly cited subspecialty journals
    Mei, Xiaolong
    Zhu, Xuwei
    Zhang, Tao
    Jia, Zhiwei
    Wan, Chunyou
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 28 : 8 - 12
  • [3] STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Ozdincler, Arzu Razak
    Huseyinsinoglu, Burcu Ersoz
    Alpozgen, Ayse Zengin
    Tarakci, Ela
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2016, 27 (02): : 72 - 80
  • [4] Trends in ophthalmology journals: a five-year bibliometric analysis (2009-2013)
    Schulz, Christopher B.
    Kennedy, Alasdair
    Rymer, Ben C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 9 (11) : 1669 - 1675
  • [5] Worldwide Research Productivity in the Field of Arthroscopy: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Liang, Zhimin
    Luo, Xuyao
    Gong, Feng
    Bao, Hongwei
    Qian, Haiping
    Jia, Zhiwei
    Li, Guo
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (08): : 1452 - 1457
  • [6] Peer review report 1 on "Worldwide productivity in the hand and wrist literature: A bibliometric analysis of four highly cited subspecialty journals"
    Canal, Alessandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 25 : 133 - 133
  • [7] Trends in Distance Education Research: A Content Analysis of Journals 2009-2013
    Bozkurt, Aras
    Akgun-Ozbek, Ela
    Yilmazel, Sibel
    Erdogdu, Erdem
    Ucar, Hasan
    Guler, Emel
    Sezgin, Sezan
    Karadeniz, Abdulkadir
    Sen-Ersoy, Nazife
    Goksel-Canbek, Nil
    Dincer, Gokhan Deniz
    Ari, Suleyman
    Aydin, Cengiz Hakan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2015, 16 (01): : 330 - 363
  • [8] Worldwide research productivity in the field of back pain A bibliometric analysis
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Peng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [9] Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis
    Cheng, Tao
    Zhang, Guoyou
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 52 (09) : 1630 - 1634
  • [10] Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis
    Sa’ed H Zyoud
    Samah W Al-Jabi
    Waleed M Sweileh
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 14