A small proton charge radius from an electron-proton scattering experiment

被引:223
|
作者
Xiong, W. [1 ,2 ]
Gasparian, A. [3 ]
Gao, H. [1 ,2 ]
Dutta, D. [4 ]
Khandaker, M. [5 ]
Liyanage, N. [6 ]
Pasyuk, E. [7 ]
Peng, C. [1 ,2 ]
Bai, X. [6 ]
Ye, L. [4 ]
Gnanvo, K. [6 ]
Gu, C. [1 ,2 ]
Levillain, M. [3 ]
Yan, X. [1 ,2 ]
Higinbotham, D. W. [7 ]
Meziane, M. [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Z. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Adhikari, K. [4 ]
Aljawrneh, B. [3 ]
Bhatt, H. [4 ]
Bhetuwal, D. [4 ]
Brock, J. [7 ]
Burkert, V. [7 ]
Carlin, C. [7 ]
Deur, A. [7 ]
Di, D. [6 ]
Dunne, J. [4 ]
Ekanayaka, P. [4 ]
El-Fassi, L. [4 ]
Emmich, B. [4 ]
Gan, L. [9 ]
Glamazdin, O. [10 ]
Kabir, M. L. [4 ]
Karki, A. [4 ]
Keith, C. [7 ]
Kowalski, S. [11 ]
Lagerquist, V. [12 ]
Larin, I. [13 ,14 ]
Liu, T. [1 ,2 ]
Liyanage, A. [15 ]
Maxwell, J. [7 ]
Meekins, D. [7 ]
Nazeer, S. J. [15 ]
Nelyubin, V. [6 ]
Nguyen, H. [6 ]
Pedroni, R. [3 ]
Perdrisat, C. [16 ]
Pierce, J. [7 ]
Punjabi, V. [17 ]
Shabestari, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[2] Triangle Univ Nucl Lab, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] North Carolina A&T State Univ, Greensboro, NC 27401 USA
[4] Mississippi State Univ, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[5] Idaho State Univ, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[6] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Natl Accelerator Facil, Newport News, VA USA
[8] Argonne Natl Lab, Lemont, IL USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Wilmington, NC USA
[10] Kharkov Inst Phys & Technol, Kharkov, Ukraine
[11] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[12] Old Dominion Univ, Norfolk, VA USA
[13] Alikhanov Inst Theoret & Expt Phys NRC Kurchatov, Moscow, Russia
[14] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[15] Hampton Univ, Hampton, VA 23668 USA
[16] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA USA
[17] Norfolk State Univ, Norfolk, VA USA
[18] Yerevan Phys Inst, Yerevan, Armenia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICAL CONSTANTS; CODATA RECOMMENDED VALUES; LAMB SHIFT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Elastic electron-proton scattering (e-p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, r(p). In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen atoms(1) found a substantial discrepancy compared with previous results(2), which became known as the 'proton radius puzzle'. Despite experimental and theoretical efforts, the puzzle remains unresolved. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic measurements conducted on ordinary hydrogen(3,4). Here we report on the proton charge radius experiment at Jefferson Laboratory (PRad), a high-precision e-p experiment that was established after the discrepancy was identified. We used a magnetic-spectrometer-free method along with a windowless hydrogen gas target, which overcame several limitations of previous e-p experiments and enabled measurements at very small forward-scattering angles. Our result, r(p) = 0.831 +/- 0.007(stat) +/- 0.012(syst) femtometres, is smaller than the most recent high-precision e-p measurement(5) and 2.7 standard deviations smaller than the average of all e-p experimental results(6). The smaller r(p) we have now measured supports the value found by two previous muonic hydrogen experiments(1,7). In addition, our finding agrees with the revised value (announced in 2019) for the Rydberg constant(8)-one of the most accurately evaluated fundamental constants in physics.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A small proton charge radius from an electron–proton scattering experiment
    W. Xiong
    A. Gasparian
    H. Gao
    D. Dutta
    M. Khandaker
    N. Liyanage
    E. Pasyuk
    C. Peng
    X. Bai
    L. Ye
    K. Gnanvo
    C. Gu
    M. Levillain
    X. Yan
    D. W. Higinbotham
    M. Meziane
    Z. Ye
    K. Adhikari
    B. Aljawrneh
    H. Bhatt
    D. Bhetuwal
    J. Brock
    V. Burkert
    C. Carlin
    A. Deur
    D. Di
    J. Dunne
    P. Ekanayaka
    L. El-Fassi
    B. Emmich
    L. Gan
    O. Glamazdin
    M. L. Kabir
    A. Karki
    C. Keith
    S. Kowalski
    V. Lagerquist
    I. Larin
    T. Liu
    A. Liyanage
    J. Maxwell
    D. Meekins
    S. J. Nazeer
    V. Nelyubin
    H. Nguyen
    R. Pedroni
    C. Perdrisat
    J. Pierce
    V. Punjabi
    M. Shabestari
    Nature, 2019, 575 : 147 - 150
  • [2] Evaluation of the Proton Charge Radius from Electron-Proton Scattering
    Arrington, John
    Sick, Ingo
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL REFERENCE DATA, 2015, 44 (03)
  • [3] Robust extraction of the proton charge radius from electron-proton scattering data
    Yan, Xuefei
    Higinbotham, Douglas W.
    Dutta, Dipangkar
    Gao, Haiyan
    Gasparian, Ashot
    Khandaker, Mahbub A.
    Liyanage, Nilanga
    Pasyuk, Eugene
    Peng, Chao
    Xiong, Weizhi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2018, 98 (02)
  • [4] Coulomb corrections to elastic electron-proton scattering and the proton charge radius
    Rosenfelder, R
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2000, 479 (04) : 381 - 386
  • [5] Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data
    Lee, Gabriel
    Arrington, John R.
    Hill, Richard J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2015, 92 (01):
  • [6] Evaluation of the strength of electron-proton scattering data for determining the proton charge radius
    Horbatsch, M.
    Hessels, E. A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2016, 93 (01)
  • [7] Proton radius from electron-proton scattering and chiral perturbation theory
    Horbatsch, Marko
    Hessels, Eric A.
    Pineda, Antonio
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2017, 95 (03)
  • [8] Proton Charge Radius from Electron Scattering
    Sick, Ingo
    ATOMS, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [9] Reanalysis of low-energy electron-proton scattering data and proton radius
    Borisyuk, Dmitry
    Kobushkin, Alexander
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2020, 1002
  • [10] Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius in Electron Proton Scattering
    A. A. Vorobyev
    Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, 2019, 16 : 524 - 529