Restoration for Whom, by Whom? A Feminist Political Ecology of Restoration

被引:0
|
作者
Elias, Marlene [1 ,2 ]
Joshi, Deepa [3 ]
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth [4 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Biovers Int, Via Tre Denari 472-A, I-00054 Maccarese, Fiumicino, Italy
[2] CIAT, Via Tre Denari 472-A, I-00054 Maccarese, Fiumicino, Italy
[3] Int Water Management Inst IWMI, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka
[4] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPRI, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Feminist political ecology; gender; restoration; social inclusion; sustainability; REDD PLUS; SOCIAL VALUES; LANDSCAPE RESTORATION; GENDER; CONSERVATION; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGE; AFRICA; POLICY; FOREST;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030) frames restoration as a momentous nature-based solution for achieving many of the ecological, economic, and social objectives outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, a critical void lies at the heart of this agenda: the lack of attention to social and political dimensions of nature and restoration initiatives. At this critical juncture, urgent attention is needed to the power and politics that shape the values, meanings, and science driving restoration; and to the uneven experiences of these processes as national restoration pledges touch down in diverse and unequal contexts. In this introduction to the special issue on "Restoration for Whom, by Whom?", we critically examine the social inclusivity of restoration agendas, policies, and practices as these unfold across ecological and geographic scales. We argue that feminist political ecology (FPE), with its focus on gendered power relations, scale integration, and historical awareness, and its critique of the commodification of nature, offers a valuable lens through which to examine the socio-political and economic dynamics of restoration. Taking an FPE perspective, we elucidate how the ten papers comprising the special issue challenge mainstream narratives of environmental sustainability and suggest more grounded and nuanced ways forward for inclusive restoration initiatives. In conclusion, we highlight the urgency of addressing the systemic fault lines that create exclusions in restoration policies and practice; and the need to legitimize the plural voices, values, situated knowledges, and paths to sustainably transform degraded landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 15
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Whom to Help: Prosocial Behaviors and the Restoration of a Tarnished Identity
    Ramos, Maria C.
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2023, 67 (01) : 77 - 99
  • [2] Restoration Ecology
    不详
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (07)
  • [3] Restoration Ecology
    Werner, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2013, 26 (03): : 735 - 738
  • [4] Restoration ecology
    Sarr, D
    Puettmann, K
    Pabst, R
    Cornett, M
    Arguello, L
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2004, 102 (05) : 20 - 24
  • [5] Restoration ecology
    Alcoze, TA
    Covington, WW
    Fulé, PZ
    SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5461) : 2159 - 2159
  • [6] RESTORATION ECOLOGY
    不详
    FUTURIST, 1992, 26 (04) : 51 - 52
  • [7] ASSESSMENT - BY WHOM, FOR WHOM
    PASCHKIS, V
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1971, 93 (02) : 68 - &
  • [8] Advice, for Whom, by Whom?
    Van Dam, Theo
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2010, 45 (06) : 862 - 864
  • [9] For whom and by whom is glaciology?
    Robel, Alexander A.
    Ultee, Lizz
    Ranganathan, Meghana
    Nash, Meredith
    JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2024, 70
  • [10] Linking restoration ecology with coastal dune restoration
    Lithgow, D.
    Martinez, M. L.
    Gallego-Fernandez, J. B.
    Hesp, P. A.
    Flores, P.
    Gachuz, S.
    Rodriguez-Revelo, N.
    Jimenez-Orocio, O.
    Mendoza-Gonzalez, G.
    Alvarez-Molina, L. L.
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2013, 199 : 214 - 224