The Bilevel Structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45

被引:46
|
作者
Bludworth, Jamie L. [1 ]
Tracey, Terence J. G. [1 ]
Glidden-Tracey, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
Outcome Questionnaire-45 structure; bilevel structure; confirmatory factor analysis; FIT INDEXES;
D O I
10.1037/a0019187
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (Lambert et al., 2001) was examined in a sample of 1,100 university counseling center clients using confirmatory factor analysis. Specifically, the relative fit of 1-factor, 3-factor orthogonal, 3-factor oblique, 4-factor hierarchical, and 4-factor bilevel models were examined. Although the 3-factor oblique, 4-factor hierarchical, and 4-factor bilevel models fit the data well, the 4-factor bilevel model fit the data best. The results provided support for the fit of the 4-factor bilevel model where each item loads on I of the 3 independent scales of Symptom Distress, Social Role Performance, and Interpersonal Relations, in addition to a nonoverlapping general distress factor.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 355
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Factorial Structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45: A Study with an Italian Sample
    Lo Coco, Gianluca
    Chiappelli, Marco
    Bensi, Luca
    Gullo, Salvatore
    Prestano, Claudia
    Lambert, Michael J.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2008, 15 (06) : 418 - 423
  • [2] Alternative Models of the Outcome Questionnaire-45
    Thalmayer, Amber Gayle
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 31 (02) : 120 - 130
  • [3] Detecting and Explaining Aberrant Responding to the Outcome Questionnaire-45
    Conijn, Judith M.
    Emons, Wilco H. M.
    De Jong, Kim
    Sijtsma, Klaas
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2015, 22 (04) : 513 - 524
  • [4] Translation of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) into Japanese: A cultural adaptation
    Takara, Risa
    Beecher, Mark E.
    Okiishi, John C.
    Shimokawa, Ken
    Lambert, Michael J.
    Griner, Derek
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (02) : 154 - 166
  • [5] A comparison of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 and Outcome Questionnaire-30 in classification and prediction of treatment outcome
    Ellsworth, Jennifer R.
    Lambert, Michael J.
    Johnson, Jennifer
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2006, 13 (06) : 380 - 391
  • [6] Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire-45 in a clinical sample
    Jabrayilov, Ruslan
    Emons, Wilco H. M.
    de Jong, Kim
    Sijtsma, Klaas
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (06) : 1473 - 1481
  • [7] Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire-45 in a clinical sample
    Ruslan Jabrayilov
    Wilco H. M. Emons
    Kim de Jong
    Klaas Sijtsma
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 1473 - 1481
  • [8] Social validation of the outcome questionnaire-45: An assessment of Asian and Pacific Islander college students
    Gregersen, AT
    Nebeker, RS
    Seely, KL
    Lambert, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTICULTURAL COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 32 (04) : 194 - 205
  • [9] Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) Progress Alert Rates in Group Versus Individual Treatment: An Archival Replication
    Alldredge, Cameron
    Burlingame, Gary
    Olsen, Joseph
    Van Epps, Jake
    [J]. GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 24 (04) : 247 - 260
  • [10] The Effects of Relationship and Progress Feedback in Group Psychotherapy Using the Group Questionnaire and Outcome Questionnaire-45: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Burlingame, Gary M.
    Whitcomb, Kaitlyn E.
    Woodland, Sean C.
    Olsen, Joseph A.
    Beecher, Mark
    Gleave, Robert
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2018, 55 (02) : 116 - 131