Reduction Capacity and Factors Affecting Slip Reduction Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Matsukawa, Keitaro [1 ]
Fujiyoshi, Kanehiro [1 ]
Yanai, Yoshihide [1 ]
Kato, Takashi [1 ]
Yato, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org, Murayama Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tokyo, Japan
来源
SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH | 2022年 / 6卷 / 05期
关键词
Cortical bone trajectory; lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis; slip reduction; lumbar interbody fusion; depth of screw insertion; PEDICLE SCREWS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; IN-SITU; ARTHRODESIS; FIXATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.22603/ssrr.2021-0207
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Vertebral slip reduction has been recommended in arthrodesis for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) to achieve balanced spinal alignment and bone fusion. However, what determines the degree of slip reduction using cortical bone trajectory technique for lumbar pedicle screw insertion is yet to be determined. Thus, in this study, we aim to investigate the slip reduction capacity using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique and to identify factors affecting the slip reduction rate.Methods: This is a retrospective radiological evaluation of prospectively collected patients. In total, 49 consecutive pa-tients who underwent single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for LDS using the CBT technique were included (mean follow-up: 28.9 months). Firstly, radiological parameters of fused segment including the percentage of anterior verte-bral slip (%slip), lordotic angle, and disk height were measured. Then, patient and procedure-related parameters were exam-ined to determine factors related to the slip reduction rate using multiple regression analysis.Results: The %slip was reduced from 15.0 +/- 4.8 to 1.6 +/- 2.3% immediately after surgery and 2.2 +/- 2.9% at the last follow-up (p < 0.01), with a slip reduction rate of 87.5 +/- 15.7% and correction loss of 0.6 +/- 2.1%. As per multivariate regression analy-sis, it was found that preoperative %slip (standardized regression coefficient [beta]=-0.55, p=0.003) and the depth of screw insertion in the caudal vertebra (beta=0.38, p=0.03) were significant independent factors affecting slip reduction rate (adjusted R2 =0.29, p=0.008). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the capacity for and factors affecting slip reduction using the CBT technique for LDS. The CBT technique may be a useful option for achieving slip reduction, and the depth of screw insertion in the caudal vertebra was identified as a significant technical factor to obtain a more signifi-cant reduction of slipped vertebra.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 487
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Affecting Slip Reduction in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Fixation for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Chung, Nam-Su
    Lee, Han-Dong
    Jeon, Chang-Hoon
    Jeong, Seungmin
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (08) : 1786 - 1791
  • [2] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Quante, M.
    Kesten, H.
    Richter, A.
    Halm, H.
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2012, 41 (02): : 153 - +
  • [3] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of slippage of vertebrae for isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis: Unilateral versus bilateral interbody fusion
    Song, Xin
    Ren, Donglin
    Wu, Desheng
    Zhang, Feng
    Han, Shuai
    Wang, Jian
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 203
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: In Situ Versus Reduction
    Fan, Guoxin
    Gu, Guangfei
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Hu, Annan
    Wu, Xinbo
    Zhang, Hailong
    He, Shisheng
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 90 : 580 - +
  • [5] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study
    Sakaura, Hironobu
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Kuroda, Yusuke
    Ohwada, Tetsuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (05) : 591 - 595
  • [6] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Kim, Gang-Un
    Choo, Yoo Jin
    Lee, Gun Woo
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [7] Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Sheng, Sun-Ren
    Geng, Yi-Bo
    Zhou, Kai-Liang
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Ni, Wen-Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [8] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Jong Yeol
    Park, Jeong Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (05) : 1284 - 1293
  • [9] Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
    Fujimori, Takahito
    Le, Hai
    Schairer, William W.
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Qamirani, Erion
    Hu, Serena S.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 5 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [10] A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression Alone for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Park, Paul
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Fu, Kai-Ming G.
    Slotkin, Jonathan
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed A.
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 121 - 122