Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial

被引:227
|
作者
Lillemoe, KD
Cameron, JL
Kim, MP
Campbell, KA
Sauter, PK
Coleman, YA
Yeo, CY
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
pancreaticoduodenectomy; pancreatic fistula; fibrin glue sealant;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2004.06.011
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite substantial improvements in perioperative mortality, complications, and specifically the development of a pancreatic fistula, remain a common occurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy. It was the objective of this study to evaluate the role of fibrin glue sealant as an adjunct to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. One hundred twenty-five patients were randomized after pancreaticoduodenal resection only if, in the opinion of the surgeon, the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis was at high risk for development of a pancreatic anastomotic leak. After completion of the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, the patients were randomized to topical application of fibrin glue sealant to the surface of the anastomosis or no such application. The primary postoperative end points in this study were pancreatic fistula, total complications, death, and length of hospital stay. A total of 59 patients were randomized to the fibrin glue arm, whereas 66 patients were randomized to the control arm and did not receive fibrin glue application. The pancreatic fistula rate in the fibrin glue arm of the study was 26% vs. 30% in the control group (p = not significant [NS]). The mean length of postoperative stay for all patients randomized was similar (fibrin glue = 12.2 days, control = 13.6 days) and the mean length of stay for patients in whom pancreatic fistula developed was also not different (fibrin glue 18.9 days, control = 21.7 days). There were no differences with respect to total complications or specific complications such as postoperative bleeding, infection, or delayed gastric emptying. These data demonstrate that the topical application of fibrin glue sealant to the surface of the pancreatic anastomosis in this patient population undergoing high-risk pancreaticojejunal anastomosis did not reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula or total complications after pancreaticodudodenectomy. There seems to be no benefit regarding the use of this substance in this setting. (C) 2004 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 772
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? results of a prospective randomized trial
    Keith D. Lillemoe
    John L. Cameron
    Min P. Kim
    Kurtis A. Campbell
    Patricia K. Sauter
    Joann A. Coleman
    Charles J. Yeo
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2004, 8 : 766 - 774
  • [2] Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial - Discussion
    Traverso, LW
    Lillemoe
    Warshaw, A
    Aranba, G
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2004, 8 (07) : 772 - 774
  • [3] Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Lillemoe, KD
    Kim, MP
    Cameron, JL
    Campbell, KA
    Sauter, PK
    Coleman, JA
    Yeo, CJ
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A772 - A772
  • [4] Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of anastomotic leak after a pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Martin, Ian
    Au, Kenneth
    HPB, 2013, 15 (08) : 561 - 566
  • [5] Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Winter, Jordan M.
    Cameron, John L.
    Campbell, Kurtis A.
    Chang, David C.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Choti, Michael A.
    Coleman, JoAnn
    Hodgin, Mary B.
    Sauter, Patricia K.
    Sonnenday, Christopher F.
    Wolfgang, Christopher J.
    Marohn, Michael R.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (09) : 1280 - 1290
  • [6] Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Winter, Jordan M.
    Cameron, John L.
    Campbell, Kinds A.
    Chang, David
    Coleman, Joann
    Sauter, Patricia K.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Wolfgang, Chris L.
    Sonnenday, Chris J.
    Marohn, Michael R.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Choti, Michael A.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (04) : A853 - A853
  • [7] Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Jordan M. Winter
    John L. Cameron
    Kurtis A. Campbell
    David C. Chang
    Taylor S. Riall
    Richard D. Schulick
    Michael A. Choti
    JoAnn Coleman
    Mary B. Hodgin
    Patricia K. Sauter
    Christopher J. Sonnenday
    Christopher L. Wolfgang
    Michael R. Marohn
    Charles J. Yeo
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2006, 10 : 1280 - 1290
  • [9] Does Type of Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Decrease Rate of Pancreatic Fistula? A Randomized, Prospective, Dual-institution Trial
    Berger, Adam C.
    Howard, Thomas J.
    Kennedy, Eugene P.
    Sauter, Patricia K.
    Bower-Cherry, Maryanne
    Dutkevitch, Sarah
    Hyslop, Terry
    Schmidt, C. Max
    Rosato, Ernest L.
    Lavu, Harish
    Nakeeb, Atilla
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (05) : 738 - 747
  • [10] Does Type of Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Decrease Rate of Pancreatic Fistula? A Randomized, Prospective, Dual-institution Trial Discussion
    Cameron, John L.
    Tyler, Douglas S.
    Merchant, Nipun B.
    Adams, David B.
    Berger, Adam C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (05) : 747 - 749