Protection of intellectual property as a means of evaluating innovation performance

被引:7
|
作者
Rylkova, Zaneta [1 ]
Chobotova, Monika [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Univ Opava, Sch Business Adm Karvina, Karvina 73340, Czech Republic
关键词
innovation performance; intellectual property; innovation;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00746-1
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Intellectual property is an important tool that helps to improve the competitive position of firms in the market. Currently, companies have no motivation to protect intellectual property because they have enough experience in order to handle the entire process themselves. Commercialization of innovations into protectical use does not currently exist without the protection of intellectual property. Innovative activity is related to the definition of innovation process. Innovation performance follows the innovative activities of the company but as innovation activity it is not the property of the company. It is the result of the innovation process and arises from interactions among competing firms in a given market situation. Innovation performance (implementation of innovation) stands up to the very end of the innovation process. For measurement it is necessary to understand and describe the whole innovation process and to identify factors that may affect the ultimate realization of innovation. Innovation performance is generally considered as a crucial component of long-term competitiveness of countries and regions. The paper introduces innovative performance and patent activity of the Czech Republic on the basis of secondary research. From the primary research it may be inferred that measurement of innovative performance can have high impact on the speed of adaptability of companies to changes and development. The aim of the paper is to highlight that innovation and patent activity and their measurement are a prerequisite for the development of companies. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 552
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intellectual Property Protection and Firm Innovation
    Wagman, Liad
    Pruzansky, Yoni
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2011, 31 (04): : 2922 - 2932
  • [2] Innovation and Intellectual Property Protection Policy
    Zhang, Lifang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ICPEM 2009, VOL 1: SOCIAL ISSUES AND ECONOMIC POLICIES, 2009, : 5 - 8
  • [3] "Distance" in intellectual property protection and MNEs' foreign subsidiary innovation performance
    Konara, Palitha
    Batsakis, Georgios
    Shirodkar, Vikrant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 39 (04) : 534 - 558
  • [4] The complementary effect of intellectual property protection mechanisms on product innovation performance
    Lee, Jung Min
    Joo, Si Hyoung
    Kim, Yeonbae
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (03) : 320 - 330
  • [5] INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AT THE UNIVERSITY
    Corejova, T.
    Corejova, A.
    Rostasova, M.
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 1189 - 1198
  • [6] The Empirical Study on Influence of Intellectual Property Risk to Knowledge Protection and Innovation Performance
    Zhang Keying
    Guo Wei
    Sun Xiaohua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH WEST LAKE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMALL & MEDIUM BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 167 - 171
  • [8] Enterprise's Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property Protection
    Shen Xiaogang
    [J]. EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 4572 - 4575
  • [9] Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms in Innovation Joint Venture
    Zhang, Xin
    Wang, Xuejun
    [J]. 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15, 2007, : 4173 - 4176
  • [10] Aspects of intellectual property protection in the commercialisation of innovation projects
    Milius, PB
    [J]. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: THE CREATION OF FAVOURABLE LEGAL AND MARKET PRECONDITIONS, 1998, 25 : 88 - 90