Modern implant design for the osteosynthesis of osteoporotic bone fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Augat, P. [1 ]
Buehren, V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Privatuniv Salzburg, Inst Biomech, D-82418 Murnau, Germany
[2] Berufsgenossenschaftl Unfallklin Murnau, Murnau, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2010年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
Osteoporosis; Osteosynthesis; Fracture healing; Fracture treatment; Implant technique; MINERAL DENSITY; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; AUGMENTATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FIXATION; STRENGTH; DEFECT;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-009-1572-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Osteoporosis is characterized by a reduction of bone mass and changes in bone micro- architecture. The resulting reduction in bone strength leads to the well recognized increase in the risk of fracture, particularly at the radius, hip, and spine. The treatment of osteoporotic fractures is challenged by the reduced mechanical capacity of osteoporotic bone, reflected in reduced holding power and increased fragility. The aim of successful fracture treatment in individuals with osteoporosis is early fixation of the fracture with immediate and almost unrestricted weight-bearing capacity. The key factor for effective fracture treatment is strict adherence to the basic principles of stable fracture fixation: reposition, compression, long, wide supports, as well as additive techniques such as angular stability and bone augmentation. Modern osteosynthesis implants effectively support the application of these principles. Modifications in implant design and techniques enable the surgeon to apply and combine the essential components of the basic principles for the treatment of mechanically impaired bone. The key components employed in modern implants include integrated compression techniques, multidirectional angular stability, expandable support surfaces, as well as multiple augmentation options. However, despite modern implant technology, osteoporotic bone fractures remain a significant challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon and require meticulous planning and implementation of the basic principles.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modernes Implantatdesign für Osteosynthesen bei vorbestehender OsteoporoseModern implant design for the osteosynthesis of osteoporotic bone fractures
    P. Augat
    V. Bühren
    [J]. Der Orthopäde, 2010, 39 (4): : 397 - 406
  • [2] Osteoporotic bone fractures: intramedullary augmentation and hybrid osteosynthesis
    Gausepohl, Thomas
    Gick, Sascha
    Heck, Steffen
    Pennig, Dietmar
    [J]. UNFALLCHIRURG, 2019, 122 (08): : 596 - 603
  • [3] Osteosynthesis and allogeneic bone grafting in complex osteoporotic fractures
    Kuokkanen, H
    Räty, S
    Korkala, O
    Niskanen, R
    Syrjänen, KJ
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 24 (03) : 249 - 252
  • [4] Currents of plate osteosynthesis in osteoporotic bone
    Lampropoulou-Adamidou K.
    Karampinas P.K.
    Chronopoulos E.
    Vlamis J.
    Korres D.S.
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (4) : 427 - 433
  • [5] Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures. Modern plate osteosynthesis procedures
    Raschke, M. J.
    Stange, R.
    Koesters, C.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2012, 83 (08): : 749 - 759
  • [6] Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures. Modern plate osteosynthesis procedures
    Raschke, M. J.
    Stange, R.
    Koesters, C.
    [J]. UNFALLCHIRURG, 2012, 115 (11): : 1009 - 1019
  • [7] BONE MASS AND OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES
    HEANEY, RP
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1990, 47 (02) : 63 - 65
  • [8] Peri-implant fractures - associated with plate osteosynthesis
    Mendel, T.
    Goehre, F.
    Hofmann, G. O.
    [J]. TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2014, 16 : 323 - 329
  • [9] Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Kyle D. Anderson
    Frank C. Ko
    Amarjit S. Virdi
    D. Rick Sumner
    Ryan D. Ross
    [J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2020, 18 : 577 - 586
  • [10] Augmentation of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Clifford B. Jones
    [J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2012, 10 : 328 - 336