Endophytic colonization and field responses of hybrid spruce seedlings after inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

被引:68
|
作者
Chanway, CP [1 ]
Shishido, M
Nairn, J
Jungwirth, S
Markham, J
Xiao, G
Holl, FB
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Agr Sci, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
spruce; bacteria; inoculation; growth promotion; endophytes;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00300-X
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Bacterial colonization and growth responses of hybrid spruce (Picea glauca x engelmannii) seedlings after inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) were evaluated in controlled environment and field assays. Six antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains belonging to the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas were used as inocula. For controlled environment assays, surface sterilized seeds were inoculated with log 6 Bacillus or log 8 Pseudomonas colony-forming units (cfu) under gnotobiotic conditions for assessment of rhizosphere and internal root and stem tissue colonization. In the field trial, one-year-old, container-grown hybrid spruce seedlings were inoculated with each of the Bacillus or Pseudomonas strains 1-2 days before planting at nine field sites in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada. All six strains colonized the rhizosphere with log 5.6-7.6 cfu g(-1) root tissue under controlled environmental conditions. Two strains, Bacillus Pw-2R and Pseudomonas Sm3-RN, were also recovered from internal root and stem tissues with population sizes ranging from log 3.9 to log 5.0 cfu g(-1) plant tissue. In the field trial, PGPR survived the winter in the rhizosphere with populations of log 2 to log 5 cfu g(-1) root tissue 17 months after inoculation. In addition, spruce growth was significantly enhanced by bacterial inoculation at certain sites. The most effective growth-promoting strains were the endophytes, Sm3-RN and Pw2-R, and the external root colonizing strain, Ss2-RN. These three strains increased seedling dry weight up to 57% above noninoculated controls at five of the nine outplanting sites. Pseudomonas strain Sw1 and the other two Bacillus strains produced mean spruce dry weight increases at four of the sites. Seedling growth inhibition due to bacterial inoculation was detected at some sites. Our results confirm the short-term, sire specific effectiveness of PGPR for reforestation of conifer seedlings, and indicate that benefits of a single inoculation at planting can extend through the second year in the field. In addition, bacteria capable of colonizing the seedling interior may be more effective PGPR for spruce than those restricted to the rhizosphere and the root surface. However, site specific seedling growth promotion may necessitate matching PGPR strains to outplanting sites for effective growth promotion. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endophytic colonization of spruce by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Shishido, M
    Breuil, C
    Chanway, CP
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 1999, 29 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [2] Forest soil community responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and spruce seedlings
    Shishido, M
    Chanway, CP
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1998, 26 (03) : 179 - 186
  • [3] Forest soil community responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and spruce seedlings
    M. Shishido
    C. P. Chanway
    [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1998, 26 : 179 - 186
  • [4] Colonization and growth promotion of outplanted spruce seedlings pre-inoculated with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in the greenhouse
    Shishido, M
    Chanway, CP
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2000, 30 (06): : 845 - 854
  • [5] Field response of legumes to inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Tsigie, Angaw
    Tilak, Kolluru V. B. R.
    Saxena, Anil K.
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2011, 47 (08) : 971 - 974
  • [6] Field response of legumes to inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Angaw Tsigie
    Kolluru V. B. R. Tilak
    Anil K. Saxena
    [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2011, 47 : 971 - 974
  • [7] Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    L. C. van Loon
    [J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2007, 119 : 243 - 254
  • [8] Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    van Loon, L. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2007, 119 (03) : 243 - 254
  • [9] Different strategies for colonization and prevalence after inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria revealed by a monitoring method
    Gao, Nan
    Zhang, Huanhuan
    Xiong, Ruonan
    Fang, Li
    Shen, Weishou
    Senoo, Keishi
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2022, 68 (04) : 442 - 453
  • [10] Root colonization by inoculated plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Benizri, E
    Baudoin, E
    Guckert, A
    [J]. BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 11 (05) : 557 - 574