Worldwide research productivity in the field of psychiatry

被引:41
|
作者
Zhang, Jinghua [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaoou [3 ]
Gao, Xin [1 ]
Yang, Huizeng [1 ]
Zhen, Zhong [4 ]
Li, Qingwei [4 ]
Lin, Yiqun [4 ]
Zhao, Xiyan [4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Anding Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Tianjin City Mental Hlth Ctr, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Grad Sch, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Psychiat, Teaching Hosp 1, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] China Acad Chinese Med Sci, Guanganmen Hosp, 5 BeiXianGe St, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China
关键词
Psychiatry; Productivity; Literature; Citation; HIGHLY CITED JOURNALS; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; SCIENCE DATABASE; ARAB COUNTRIES; PUBLICATIONS; TRENDS; WEB;
D O I
10.1186/s13033-017-0127-5
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The field of psychiatry has seen significant progress in recent years due to worldwide contributions. National productivity, however, in the field of psychiatry is still unclear. In our study, we investigated contributions of individual nations to the field of psychiatry. Methods: The Web of Science was used to perform a search from 2011 to 2015 on the subject category "psychiatry". The total number of articles, citations and the per capita numbers were obtained to analyze the contributions of different countries. Results: In psychiatry journals from 2011 to 2015, 84,760 articles were published worldwide. The most productive world areas were North America, East Asia, Europe and Oceania. The percentage of articles published in high-income countries was 87.77%, middle-income countries published 12.07%, and lower-income published 0.16%. Most articles were published by the United States (32.68%); the United Kingdom was next (8.59%), which was followed by Germany (6.77%), Australia (5.87%), and Canada (4.9%). The country with the highest number of citations (243,394) was the United States. A positive correlation was found between the population/GDP and the number of publications (P < 0.01). Australia ranked the highest when normalized to population size, and the Netherlands and Norway were next. The Netherlands ranked highest, followed by Israel and Australia when adjusted for GDP. Conclusions: The authorship of most of the psychiatry articles was from high-income countries and few papers came from low-income countries. The most productive country was the United States. However, when normalized to population size and GDP, some European and Oceania countries were most productive.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Worldwide research productivity in the field of psychiatry
    Jinghua Zhang
    Xiaoou Chen
    Xin Gao
    Huizeng Yang
    Zhong Zhen
    Qingwei Li
    Yiqun Lin
    Xiyan Zhao
    [J]. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 11
  • [2] Worldwide Research Productivity in the Field of Arthroscopy: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Liang, Zhimin
    Luo, Xuyao
    Gong, Feng
    Bao, Hongwei
    Qian, Haiping
    Jia, Zhiwei
    Li, Guo
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (08): : 1452 - 1457
  • [3] Worldwide research productivity in the field of back pain A bibliometric analysis
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Peng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [4] Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis
    Sa’ed H Zyoud
    Samah W Al-Jabi
    Waleed M Sweileh
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 14
  • [5] Worldwide research productivity in the field of endocrinology and metabolism - a bibliometric analysis
    Zhao, Xiyan
    Ye, Ru
    Zhao, Linhua
    Lin, Yiqun
    Huang, Wenjing
    He, Xinhui
    Lian, Fengmei
    Tong, Xiaolin
    [J]. ENDOKRYNOLOGIA POLSKA, 2015, 66 (05) : 434 - 441
  • [6] Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis
    Zyoud, Sa'ed H.
    Al-Jabi, Samah W.
    Sweileh, Waleed M.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [7] Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis
    Cheng, Tao
    Zhang, Guoyou
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 52 (09) : 1630 - 1634
  • [8] Worldwide research productivity in the field of full-endoscopic spine surgery: a bibliometric study
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Mahatthanatrakul, Akaworn
    Ruetten, Sebastian
    Yeung, Anthony
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Ahn, Yong
    Kim, Hyeun-Sung
    Hofstetter, Christoph
    Lee, Jun-Ho
    Choi, Kyung-Chul
    Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (01) : 153 - 160
  • [9] Worldwide research productivity in the field of full-endoscopic spine surgery: a bibliometric study
    Guang-Xun Lin
    Vit Kotheeranurak
    Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul
    Sebastian Ruetten
    Anthony Yeung
    Sang-Ho Lee
    Yong Ahn
    Hyeun-Sung Kim
    Christoph Hofstetter
    Jun-Ho Lee
    Kyung-Chul Choi
    Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
    Jin-Sung Kim
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2020, 29 : 153 - 160
  • [10] Worldwide research productivity in the field of spine surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis
    Meiyang Wei
    Wanming Wang
    Yanfeng Zhuang
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 976 - 982