Epigenetics drive the evolution of sex chromosomes in animals and plants

被引:18
|
作者
Muyle, Aline [1 ]
Bachtrog, Doris [2 ]
Marais, Gabriel A. B. [3 ,4 ]
Turner, James M. A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Integrat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, UMR 5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Lisbon, LEAF Linking Landscape Environm Agr & Food, Inst Super Agron, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Francis Crick Inst, London, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
meiotic sex chromosome inactivation; Y degeneration; Y toxicity; X chromosome inactivation; X upregulation; imprinting; MAMMALIAN X-CHROMOSOME; DOSAGE-COMPENSATION MECHANISM; Y-CHROMOSOME; TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; UP-REGULATION; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; GENE-EXPRESSION; LINKED GENES; RNA-SEQ; INACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2020.0124
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We review how epigenetics affect sex chromosome evolution in animals and plants. In a few species, sex is determined epigenetically through the action of Y-encoded small RNAs. Epigenetics is also responsible for changing the sex of individuals through time, even in species that carry sex chromosomes, and could favour species adaptation through breeding system plasticity. The Y chromosome accumulates repeats that become epigenetically silenced which leads to an epigenetic conflict with the expression of Y genes and could accelerate Y degeneration. Y heterochromatin can be lost through ageing, which activates transposable elements and lowers male longevity. Y chromosome degeneration has led to the evolution of meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in eutherians (placentals) and marsupials, and dosage compensation mechanisms in animals and plants. X-inactivation convergently evolved in eutherians and marsupials via two independently evolved non-coding RNAs. In Drosophila, male X upregulation by the male specific lethal (MSL) complex can spread to neo-X chromosomes through the transposition of transposable elements that carry an MSL-binding motif. We discuss similarities and possible differences between plants and animals and suggest future directions for this dynamic field of research. This article is part of the theme issue 'How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?'
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Young sex chromosomes in plants and animals
    Charlesworth, Deborah
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2019, 224 (03) : 1095 - 1107
  • [2] The sex-specific region of sex chromosomes in animals and plants
    Andrea R. Gschwend
    Laura A. Weingartner
    Richard C. Moore
    Ray Ming
    Chromosome Research, 2012, 20 : 57 - 69
  • [3] The sex-specific region of sex chromosomes in animals and plants
    Gschwend, Andrea R.
    Weingartner, Laura A.
    Moore, Richard C.
    Ming, Ray
    CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2012, 20 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [4] Evolution of Sex Chromosomes and Gynoecium Suppression in Plants
    Kobayashi, Taiki
    Kitoh, Moe
    Filatov, Dmitry A.
    Kazama, Yusuke
    CYTOLOGIA, 2023, 88 (02) : 91 - 94
  • [5] The Evolution of Sex Chromosomes and Dosage Compensation in Plants
    Muyle, Aline
    Shearn, Rylan
    Marais, Gabriel A. B.
    GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 9 (03): : 627 - 645
  • [6] Microbes Drive Evolution of Animals and Plants: the Hologenome Concept
    Rosenberg, Eugene
    Zilber-Rosenberg, Ilana
    MBIO, 2016, 7 (02):
  • [7] The role of repetitive DNA in structure and evolution of sex chromosomes in plants
    Kejnovsky, E.
    Hobza, R.
    Cermak, T.
    Kubat, Z.
    Vyskot, B.
    HEREDITY, 2009, 102 (06) : 533 - 541
  • [8] The role of repetitive DNA in structure and evolution of sex chromosomes in plants
    E Kejnovsky
    R Hobza
    T Cermak
    Z Kubat
    B Vyskot
    Heredity, 2009, 102 : 533 - 541
  • [9] B Chromosomes and Sex in Animals
    Camacho, J. P. M.
    Schmid, M.
    Cabrero, J.
    SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 5 (03) : 155 - 166
  • [10] THE CONTRIBUTION OF FEMALE MEIOTIC DRIVE TO THE EVOLUTION OF NEO-SEX CHROMOSOMES
    Yoshida, Kohta
    Kitano, Jun
    EVOLUTION, 2012, 66 (10) : 3198 - 3208