Bond coefficient, kb, of GFRP bars

被引:8
|
作者
Benzecry, Vanessa [1 ]
Emparanza, Alvaro Ruiz [1 ]
Basalo, Francisco De Casoy [1 ]
Nanni, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 1251 Mem Dr, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GFRP bars; Reinforced concrete; Crack width; Testing; Design guides; REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS; FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR; SERVICEABILITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123380
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Due to the increase in the number of manufacturers of GFRP bars, there is currently a variety of products in the marketplace with different physical and mechanical properties. These differences directly influence the bond coefficient, k(b), a coefficient intended to relate the behavior of GFRP to that of steel bars for the computation of crack width and deflection of reinforced concrete elements. The 2015 version of the Guide for Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber Reinforced Polymers by ACI Committee 440 recommends a k(b) value of 1.4 for bars that have not been experimentally tested. To establish a specific k(b), bars could be experimentally tested according to the 2012 edition of Canadian Standard S806-12. This test method is rather complex and has produced k(b) values varying from 0.69 to 1.61 according to published literature. The study presented in this paper determined k(b) according to the Canadian test method and a simpler proposed variation. This comparison is based on data derived from twenty-three beams tested to determine k(b) for two types of GFRP bars (Type-A and Type-B) and a conventional steel bar (Type-S). Bar Type-A is sand-coated with a helical wrap surface treatment, while Type-B is helically grooved. The investigation yielded similar results for both test methods and indicated some advantages with the use of the proposed test method. The k(b) of the Type-A presented a slightly better (lower) k(b) than the Type-B. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bond-Dependent Coefficient kb for New-Generation GFRP Bars
    Benmokrane, Brahim
    Mehany, Shehab
    Shield, Carol
    Nanni, Antonio
    Brown, Vicki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 27 (06)
  • [2] Bond Coefficient kb of Concrete Beams Reinforced with GFRP CFRP, and Steel Bars
    Kabashi, Naser
    Kepuska, Arber
    Krasniqi, Enes
    Avdyli, Besart
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2021, 7 (07): : 1235 - 1243
  • [3] Review of bond strength coefficient (kb) between FRP bars and concrete
    Junaid, M. Talha
    Nassif, Nadia
    Altoubat, Salah
    Maalej, Mohamed
    Barakat, Samer
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2024, 63
  • [4] Experimental Study on Bond Strength of GFRP Bars
    Patil, Sagar B.
    Manjunatha, G. S.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 21 : 1044 - 1049
  • [5] TENSILE AND BOND PROPERTIES OF GFRP REINFORCING BARS
    MALVAR, LJ
    [J]. ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 1995, 92 (03) : 276 - 285
  • [6] Bond mechanism and bond strength of GFRP bars to concrete: A review
    Yan, Fei
    Lin, Zhibin
    Yang, Mijia
    [J]. COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2016, 98 : 56 - 69
  • [7] ANALYSIS OF THE BOND STRESS WHEN USING GFRP BARS
    Dalfre, G. M.
    De Almeida Filho, F. M.
    Couto, I
    Giongo, S.
    Mazzu, A. D. E.
    [J]. HOLOS, 2021, 37 (05)
  • [8] Experimental and analytical evaluation of bond properties of GFRP bars
    Pecce, M
    Manfredi, G
    Realfonzo, R
    Cosenza, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 13 (04) : 282 - 290
  • [9] Bond behavior of geopolymer concrete with steel and GFRP bars
    Romanazzi, V.
    Leone, M.
    Aiello, M. A.
    Pecce, M. R.
    [J]. COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2022, 300
  • [10] Effect of aging on bond of GFRP bars embedded in concrete
    Robert, Mathieu
    Benmokrane, Brahim
    [J]. CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2010, 32 (06): : 461 - 467