Comparison of Soil pH Methods on Soils of North America

被引:129
|
作者
Miller, Robert O. [1 ]
Kissel, David E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Agr & Environ Serv Labs, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
CALCIUM-CHLORIDE; WATER; ACIDITY;
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2008.0047
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil pH, one of the most routine measurements performed, is used to interpret chemical reactions, nutrient availabilities, and the rates of many biological processes in soils. Predominantly, soil pH is measured in soil-water suspensions using a glass H(+)-sensing electrode and a reference electrode. Soil/warer ratios of the suspensions ranging from saturated paste to 1:5 are used in research and commercial sod testing laboratories. The objective of this study was to evaluate relationships between pH measured in saturated paste extract (pH(sp)), 1:1 and 1:2 soil/water suspensions (pH(1:1w) and pH(1:2w)), and 1:1 and 1:2 soil/0.01 mol L(-1) CaCl(2) suspensions (pH(1:1CaCl2) and pH(1:2CaCl2)). In addition, the effects of soil suspension electrical conductivity (EC(1:1w)) on measured values of soil pH were assessed. Analytical results for 120 agricultural soil samples from a laboratory proficiency program database indicated that the relationship between pH(1:1w) and pH(1:1CaCl2) was highly significant (r(2) = 0.984). Similar regressions were found between pH(sp) and pH(1:1CaCl2), and between pH(1:2w) and pH(1:2CaCl2). The EC(1:1w) explained 85.1% of the variation in the difference between pH(1:1w) and pH(1:1CaCl). A model comprised of a linear term of pH(1:1CaCl) and a nonlinear term EC(1:1w) explained 99.5% of the variation in soil pH(1:1w) with the estimated pH of 88% of the sods between +/-0.10 pH units of the measured pH(1:1w). Results for individual sods indicated that a nonlinear function using matrix EC explained >98% of the variation in soil pH across a range of soil/water ratios and suspension matrices ranging from 0.00 to 0.01 mol L(-1) CaCl(2). It is our assertion that the current practice of determining soil pH in soil-water suspensions of low ionic strength results in a significant analytical measurement error associated with liquid junction potentials of a glass reference-H(+) electrode system. For soil diagnostic analysis purposes, we concluded that the measurement of soil pH using 0.01 mol L(-1) CaCl(2) solution at a soil/water ratio of 1:1 is a more robust measurement for soils of North America.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 316
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of methods for soil pH determination
    Zbíral, J
    [J]. ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 2001, 47 (10): : 463 - 466
  • [2] A Comparison of Analytical Methods for the Determination of Soil pH: Case Study on Burned Soils in Northern Portugal
    Faria, Maria
    Bertocco, Tamires
    Barroso, Ana
    Carvalho, Manuela
    Fonseca, Felicia
    Matos, Cristina Delerue
    Figueiredo, Tomas
    Braga, Amalia Sequeira
    Valente, Teresa
    Jimenez-Ballesta, Raimundo
    [J]. FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2023, 6 (06):
  • [3] COMPARISON OF ESTIMATION METHODS OF SOIL STRENGTH IN FIVE SOILS
    Ajayi, Ayodele Ebenezer
    Dias, Moacir de Souza, Jr.
    Curi, Nilton
    Araujo, Cezar Francisco, Jr.
    Aladenola, Olanike Olaiya
    Teixeira Souza, Thiago Tadeu
    Inda Junior, Alberto Vasconcellos
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2009, 33 (03): : 487 - 495
  • [4] COMPARISON OF SEVERAL SPATIAL PREDICTION METHODS FOR SOIL-PH
    LASLETT, GM
    MCBRATNEY, AB
    PAHL, PJ
    HUTCHINSON, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1987, 38 (02): : 325 - 341
  • [5] FURTHER COMPARISON OF SPATIAL METHODS FOR PREDICTING SOIL-PH
    LASLETT, GM
    MCBRATNEY, AB
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1990, 54 (06) : 1553 - 1558
  • [6] Determining soil organic carbon for agricultural soils: a comparison between the Walkley & Black and the dry combustion methods (north Belgium)
    Meersmans, J.
    Van Wesemael, B.
    Van Molle, M.
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 25 (04) : 346 - 353
  • [7] SOIL REACTION - GLASS ELECTRODE AND COLORIMETRIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING PH VALUES OF SOILS
    REED, JF
    CUMMINGS, RW
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE, 1945, 59 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [8] Comparing Four Methods of Measuring Soil Organic Matter in North Carolina Soils
    Roper, Wayne R.
    Robarge, Wayne P.
    Osmond, Deanna L.
    Heitman, Joshua L.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2019, 83 (02) : 466 - 474
  • [9] A comparison of differing perceptions of the benefits of design methods in Europe and North America
    Benedetto-Neto, H
    Campello, AC
    Segre, FM
    Wright, IC
    [J]. ENGINEERING DESIGN CONFERENCE '98: DESIGN REUSE, 1998, : 419 - 425
  • [10] Comparison and Analysis of Design Methods for Sleeper between China and North America
    Tian, Chunxiang
    Wang, Ping
    Xiong, Wei
    Mo, Hongyuan
    [J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2020, 37 (10) : 49 - 53