How much is enough? Adequate sample size for littoral macroinvertebrates in lowland lakes

被引:17
|
作者
Schreiber, Juergen [1 ]
Brauns, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries, Dept Shallow Lakes & Lowland Rivers, D-12587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Coarse woody debris; Spatial variability; Species richness; Species-area curves; Water Framework Directive; HABITAT STABILITY; NEW-ZEALAND; COMMUNITIES; ZONE; RARE; INVERTEBRATES; BIOASSESSMENT; ASSEMBLAGES; VARIABLES; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1007/s10750-010-0284-x
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Littoral macroinvertebrates are increasingly used for assessing the ecological status of lakes according to the EU Water Framework Directive. This requires harmonised sampling methods, but information on the appropriate spatial scale of the sampling as well as on the adequate sample sizes are mostly lacking. In this study, we compared the spatial variability of littoral (< 1.2 m water depth) macroinvertebrate community composition within habitats and within sites to test whether habitat-specific sampling can reduce their spatial variability. Furthermore, we determined the sample size necessary to obtain maximum species richness for a given habitat type. Spatial variability of macroinvertebrate community composition was significantly lower within habitats than within sampling sites, except for communities of coarse woody debris. Species-area curves revealed that a sample size of 1 m(2) per habitat was not sufficient to obtain the maximum species richness due to the dominance of rare species, which suggests that compilation of taxon inventories may require more exhaustive sampling with sampling sizes substantially larger than 1 m(2). Separate analysis for species assigned to incidence classes showed that a mean area of 0.63 m(2) per habitat is sufficient to record all species with frequent and medium incidences, and 76% of the rare species. We conclude that habitat-specific sampling is an effective way to reduce the inherent spatial variability of littoral macroinvertebrate communities and that a sample size of 0.63 m(2) per habitat is sufficient to represent their dominant and subdominant elements. The application of this adequate sample size to other lake types than large oligotrophic lakes has to be exercised with caution, in particular if community composition and richness patterns differ. However, our results are based on data from lakes that represent the typical lake type found throughout the Central Baltic ecoregion ensuring its wider applicability in this ecoregion.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 373
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] How much is enough? Adequate sample size for littoral macroinvertebrates in lowland lakes
    Jürgen Schreiber
    Mario Brauns
    [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2010, 649 : 365 - 373
  • [2] SAMPLE-SIZE - HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH
    AUSTIN, HW
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 1983, 17 (03) : 239 - 245
  • [3] Effects of human shoreline development on littoral macroinvertebrates in lowland lakes
    Brauns, Mario
    Garcia, Xavier-Francois
    Walz, Norbert
    Pusch, Martin T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2007, 44 (06) : 1138 - 1144
  • [4] ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION AND NUMERIC EQUIVALENCY - HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH
    CARPENTER, E
    [J]. COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 1995, 56 (02): : 116 - 118
  • [5] Sample size: How many is enough?
    Burmeister, Elizabeth
    Aitken, Leanne M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 25 (04) : 271 - 274
  • [6] Littoral macroinvertebrates in Estonian lowland lakes: the effects of habitat, season, eutrophication and land use on some metrics of biological quality
    Timm, Henn
    Moels, Tonu
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED LIMNOLOGY, 2012, 180 (02) : 145 - 156
  • [7] Sample size and power: How big is big enough?
    Fitzmaurice, G
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (03) : 289 - 290
  • [8] Non-native minnows cause much larger negative effects than trout on littoral macroinvertebrates of high mountain lakes
    Osorio, Victor
    Puig, Maria Angeles
    Buchaca, Teresa
    Sabas, Ibor
    Miro, Alexandre
    Lucati, Federica
    Suh, Jongmo
    Pou-Rovira, Quim
    Ventura, Marc
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 272
  • [9] How Much Is Enough?: Recommendations for Minimum Sample Sizes for Common Psychometric Analyses
    Peipert, John
    Martin-Delgado, Jimmy
    Foster, Brandon
    Gugiu, Cristian
    Henkle, Emily
    Kaat, Aaron J.
    Liu, Jia
    Osman, Ahmed M. Y.
    Nikki, O. W.
    Zigler, Christina
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 : S116 - S116
  • [10] How much is enough? The convergence of finite sample scattering properties to those of infinite media
    Penttila, Antti
    Markkanen, Johannes
    Vaisanen, Timo
    Rabina, Jukka
    Yurkin, Maxim A.
    Muinonen, Karri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2021, 262 (262):