Can Academic Departments Maintain Industry Relationships While Promoting Physician Professionalism?

被引:10
|
作者
Dubovsky, Steven L. [1 ,2 ]
Kaye, David L.
Pristach, Cynthia A.
DelRegno, Paula
Pessar, Linda
Stiles, Keith [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Psychiat, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Forest Pharmaceut, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c42deb
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The authors describe the development of a comprehensive policy for relationships of full-time and volunteer faculty and residents with industry. The underlying philosophy was that an academic approach to relations with industry that emphasizes objective outcomes and internal change will be more effective than rote restrictions on behavior that assume that physicians cannot learn new behaviors and that are impossible to enforce. The policy, developed through much discussion and debate with stakeholders, involves elimination of industry-supplied meals, gifts, and favors; integration of industry-sponsored and academic research; education of faculty and residents about the ways in which industry marketing influences clinical decision making; and comprehensive disclosure by faculty, including to patients, of financial interests in industry. At occasional points in the psychopharmacology curriculum and at a departmental "pharma symposium," industry representatives or industry-sponsored guest speakers are allowed to present peer-reviewed articles followed by comments by a faculty member with relevant expertise about aspects of the presentation that are accurate or misleading and by a general discussion of research and clinical implications of the research and the manner in which it is presented. Adherence to new protocols has been high because faculty and residents participated in developing them and are involved in their implementation. Acceptance by industry representatives has been variable. Experience with this approach suggests that it is possible to develop a collaborative relationship with industry that maintains appropriate boundaries between industry and academia.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Physician Professionalism and Changes in Physician-Industry Relationships From 2004 to 2009
    Campbell, Eric G.
    Rao, Sowmya R.
    DesRoches, Catherine M.
    Iezzoni, Lisa I.
    Vogeli, Christine
    Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
    Miralles, Paola D.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (20) : 1820 - 1826
  • [2] Physician-industry relationships - An academic obstetrics and gynecology department viewpoint
    Peyre, Sarah E.
    Macdonald, Heather R.
    Ferro, Jodi
    Epstein, Aaron J.
    Randel, Erin
    Muderspach, Laila I.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 71S - 71S
  • [4] Shadow Scholars and the Rise of the Dissertation Service Industry: Can We Maintain Academic Integrity?
    White, Jeffry L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (01):
  • [5] Establishing productive university/industry relationships: Transferring technology while protecting academic freedom.
    Keel, B
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 226 : U341 - U341
  • [6] Counterpoint - Physician-industry relationships can be ethically established, and conflicts of interest can be ethically managed
    White, Andrew P.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Zdeblick, Thomas
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (11) : S53 - S57
  • [7] Bias in high-tier medical journals concerning physician-academic relationships with industry
    Lesko, Roman
    Scott, Samuel
    Stossel, Thomas P.
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (04) : 320 - 322
  • [8] Bias in high-tier medical journals concerning physician-academic relationships with industry
    Roman Lesko
    Samuel Scott
    Thomas P Stossel
    [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30 : 320 - 322
  • [9] Restoring balance to industry-academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest - Promoting research while maintaining trust
    Johns, MME
    Barnes, M
    Florencio, PS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (06): : 741 - 746