Influence of level of feed input and procedure on metabolisable energy and endogenous energy loss (EEL) with adult cockerels

1. Two experiments were performed to study the relationship between apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and true metabolisable energy (TME) values at different feed intakes. Rhode Island Red (RIR) adult cockerels were used in two bioassays, under standard conditions. 2. In the first experiment (precision feeding) the birds were not fed for 24 h and then various quantities of maize were fed. There were 6 replicates per treatment. Droppings voided during the 48 h of the experimental period were collected and assayed for gross energy and nitrogen. 3. In the second experiment, each bird was given a 3-d adaptation period, fasted for 24 h and then given maize as an admixture (conventional addition method: CAM) to the same rations as those used in the first experiment. During the 3 d of the experimental period, droppings were collected and frozen for chemical analysis. 4. The results showed that mean metabolisable energy (ME) values obtained by the precision-feeding procedure were higher than those obtained by CAM. The endogenous energy loss (EEL) (FEm + UEc) determined by precision feeding was lower than that given by CAM. 5. It was concluded that the method of feeding does not influence ME of maize at different feed inputs. However, differences among intercepts of the regression between ME and feed input suggest that EEL varies at different maize inputs. 6. The optimum maize quantity was approximately 35 to 40 g for adult RIR cockerels by both procedures.