Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up

被引:42
|
作者
Herbert, Robert D. [1 ,2 ]
Kasza, Jessica [3 ]
Bo, Kari [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia NeuRA, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Oslo, Norway
[5] Akershus Univ Hosp, Lorenskog, Norway
来源
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical trials; Randomized controlled trials; Long-term follow-up; Non-compliance; Treatment switching; Co-intervention; Loss to follow-up; LONGITUDINAL DATA; CAUSAL; TRUNCATION; INTENTION; TREAT;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
    Robert D. Herbert
    Jessica Kasza
    Kari Bø
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [2] The importance of long-term follow-up in clinical trials
    Norrie, John
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 11 (07): : E995 - E996
  • [3] Long-term follow-up in AIDS clinical trials
    Schoenfeld, DA
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1996, 15 (21-22) : 2359 - 2366
  • [4] How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?
    Fewtrell, Mary S.
    Kennedy, Kathy
    Singhal, Atul
    Martin, Richard M.
    Ness, Andy
    Hadders-Algra, Mijna
    Koletzko, Berthold
    Lucas, Alan
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2008, 93 (06) : 458 - 461
  • [5] Survival Differences in Clinical Trials With Long-Term Follow-Up
    Kostis, William J.
    Moreyra, Abel E.
    Cabrera, Javier
    Kostis, John B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (05) : 600 - 600
  • [6] Long-term follow-up of lipid-lowering trials
    Packard, Chris J.
    Ford, Ian
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) : 572 - 579
  • [7] Long-term follow-up in AIDS clinical trials - Discussion
    Follmann, D
    Schoenfeld, D
    Williams, P
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1996, 15 (21-22) : 2367 - 2370
  • [8] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF A PRAGMATIC, PRIMARY CARE-BASED RANDOMISED TRIALS FOR SHOULDER PAIN
    Hay, E. M.
    Thomas, E.
    Dziedzic, K.
    Croft, P. R.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 : 35 - 36
  • [9] The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) randomised controlled trials: long-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Patel, Rajesh
    Powell, Janet T.
    Sweeting, Michael J.
    Epstein, David M.
    Barrett, Jessica K.
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (05) : 1 - +
  • [10] REPLY: Survival Differences in Clinical Trials With Long-Term Follow-up
    Henderson, Robert A.
    Jarvis, Chris
    Clayton, Tim
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    Fox, Keith A. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (05) : 601 - 601