Training for shoulder dystocia - A trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins

被引:182
|
作者
Crofts, Joanna F.
Bartlett, Christine
Ellis, Denise
Hunt, Linda P.
Fox, Robert
Draycott, Timothy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, N Bristol NHS Trust, SaFE Study, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Healthcare Trust Educ Ctr, Inst Child Life & Hlth, Univ Dept Clin Sci S Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Musgrave Pk Hosp, Taunton & Somerset Natl Hlth Serv Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Taunton, Somerset, England
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2006年 / 108卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000246801.45977.c8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation training for shoulder dystocia management and compare training using a high-fidelity mannequin with that using traditional devices. METHODS: Training was undertaken in six hospitals and a medical simulation center in the United Kingdom. Midwives and obstetricians working for participating hospitals were eligible for inclusion. One hundred forty participants (45 doctors, 95 midwives) were randomized to training with a high-fidelity training mannequin (incorporating force perception training) or traditional low-fidelity mannequins. Performance was assessed pre- and posttraining, using a videoed, standardized shoulder dystocia simulation. Outcome measures were delivery, head-to-body delivery time, use of appropriate and inappropriate actions, force applied, and communication. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two participants completed the posttraining assessment. All training was associated with improved performance: use of basic maneuvers 114 of 140 (81.4%) to 125 of 132 (94.7%) (P=.002), successful deliveries 60 of 140 (42.9%) to 110 of 132 (83.3%) (P<.001), good communication with the patient 79 of 139 (56.8%) to 109 of 132 (82.6%) (P<.001), pre- and posttraining, respectively. Training with the high-fidelity mannequin was associated with a higher successful delivery rate than training with traditional devices: 94% compared with 72% (odds ratio 6.53, 95% confidence interval 2.05-20.81; P=.002). Total applied force was significantly lower for those who had undergone force training (2,030 Newton seconds versus 2,916 Newton seconds; P=.006) but there was no significant difference in the peak applied force 102 Newtons versus 112 Newtons (P=.242). CONCLUSION: This study verifies the need for shoulder dystocia training; before training only 43% participants could achieve delivery. All training with mannequins improved the management of simulated shoulder dystocia. Training on a high-fidelity mannequin, including force perception teaching, offered additional training benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1485
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-fidelity simulation in a shoulder dystocia scenario
    Palla, Giulia
    Mannella, Paolo
    Simoncini, Tommaso
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 : 166 - 167
  • [2] The improvement and retention of skills in shoulder dystocia management with the use of high-fidelity simulation: The SAFE (SimulAtion high-FidElity) study
    Papoutsis, Dimitrios
    Klazoglou, Paraskevi
    Valasoulis, George
    Tzavara, Chara
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (03)
  • [3] The Effects of High-Fidelity Simulation, Low-Fidelity Simulation, and Video Training on Nursing Student Anxiety in the Clinical Setting
    Thompson, C. Elise
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 42 (03) : 162 - 164
  • [4] High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students
    Christina Massoth
    Hannah Röder
    Hendrik Ohlenburg
    Michael Hessler
    Alexander Zarbock
    Daniel M. Pöpping
    Manuel Wenk
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 19
  • [5] High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students
    Massoth, Christina
    Roeder, Hannah
    Ohlenburg, Hendrik
    Hessler, Michael
    Zarbock, Alexander
    Poepping, Daniel M.
    Wenk, Manuel
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [6] A Randomized Controlled Trial of a High-Fidelity vs. Low-Fidelity Simulation Training on Comfort, Competence, and Skills with IUD insertion
    Haviland, M.
    Nippita, S.
    Voit, S.
    Perez-Peralta, J.
    Hacker, M.
    Paul, M.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (04) : 396 - 396
  • [7] High-fidelity patient simulation mannequins to facilitate aerodigestive endoscopy training
    Deutsch, Ellen S.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2008, 134 (06) : 625 - 629
  • [8] On the Alignment of Low-Fidelity and High-Fidelity Simulation Spaces for the Design of Microwave Waveguide Filters
    Ossorio, Javier
    Carlos Melgarejo, Juan
    Boria, Vicente E.
    Guglielmi, Marco
    Bandler, John W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2018, 66 (12) : 5183 - 5196
  • [9] Are Simulation Stethoscopes a Useful Adjunct for Emergency Residents' Training on High-fidelity Mannequins?
    Warrington, Steven J.
    Beeson, Michael S.
    Fire, Frank L.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (03) : 275 - 277
  • [10] High-fidelity simulation on shoulder dystocia management in Greek Midwives: the SAFE study
    Papoutsis, Dimitrios
    Klazoglou, Paraskevi
    Valasoulis, George
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 128 - 128