Considerations for animal models of blast-related traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy

被引:45
|
作者
Goldstein, Lee E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McKee, Ann C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Stanton, Patric K. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Coll Engn, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Alzheimers Dis Ctr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, US Dept Vet Affairs, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[5] New York Med Coll, Dept Neurol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[6] New York Med Coll, Dept Cell Biol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[7] New York Med Coll, Dept Anat, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
HIGH EXPLOSIVES; APOLIPOPROTEIN-E; GENETIC-FACTORS; WAR VETERAN; BIOMARKERS; IRAQ; OVERPRESSURE; STATEMENT; EXPOSURE; US;
D O I
10.1186/s13195-014-0064-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The association of military blast exposure and brain injury was first appreciated in World War I as commotio cerebri, and later as shell shock. Similar injuries sustained in modern military conflicts are now classified as mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recent research has yielded new insights into the mechanisms by which blast exposure leads to acute brain injury and chronic sequelae, including postconcussive syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, post-traumatic headache, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a tau protein neurodegenerative disease. Impediments to delivery of effective medical care for individuals affected by blast-related TBI include: poor insight into the heterogeneity of neurological insults induced by blast exposure; limited understanding of the mechanisms by which blast exposure injures the brain and triggers sequelae; failure to appreciate interactive injuries that affect frontal lobe function, pituitary regulation, and neurovegetative homeostasis; unknown influence of genetic risk factors, prior trauma, and comorbidities; absence of validated diagnostic criteria and clinical nosology that differentiate clinical endophenotypes; and lack of empirical evidence to guide medical management and therapeutic intervention. While clinicopathological analysis can provide evidence of correlative association, experimental use of animal models remains the primary tool for establishing causal mechanisms of disease. However, the TBI field is confronted by a welter of animal models with varying clinical relevance, thereby impeding scientific coherence and hindering translational progress. Animal models of blast TBI will be far more translationally useful if experimental emphasis focuses on accurate reproduction of clinically relevant endpoints (output) rather than scaled replication of idealized blast shockwaves (input). The utility of an animal model is dependent on the degree to which the model recapitulates pathophysiological mechanisms, neuropathological features, and neurological sequelae observed in the corresponding human disorder. Understanding the purpose of an animal model and the criteria by which experimental results derived from the model are validated are critical components for useful animal modeling. Animal models that reliably demonstrate clinically relevant endpoints will expedite development of new treatments, diagnostics, preventive measures, and rehabilitative strategies for individuals affected by blast TBI and its aftermath.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Considerations for animal models of blast-related traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy
    Lee E Goldstein
    Ann C McKee
    Patric K Stanton
    [J]. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 6
  • [2] Blast-related traumatic brain injury
    Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
    McFarlane, Alexander C.
    Bragge, Peter
    Armonda, Rocco A.
    Grimes, Jamie B.
    Ling, Geoffrey S.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2013, 12 (09): : 882 - 893
  • [3] Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Concepts and Research Considerations
    Bryden, Daniel W.
    Tilghman, Jessica I.
    Hinds, Sidney R., II
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [4] Military Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury
    Justin Weppner
    Mark Linsenmeyer
    William Ide
    [J]. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2019, 7 : 323 - 332
  • [5] Military Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury
    Weppner, Justin
    Linsenmeyer, Mark
    Ide, William
    [J]. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS, 2019, 7 (04) : 323 - 332
  • [6] Unconventional animal models for traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy
    Ackermans, Nicole L.
    Varghese, Merina
    Wicinski, Bridget
    Torres, Joshua
    De Gasperi, Rita
    Pryor, Dylan
    Elder, Gregory A.
    Sosa, Miguel A. Gama
    Reidenberg, Joy S.
    Williams, Terrie M.
    Hof, Patrick R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2021, 99 (10) : 2463 - 2477
  • [7] Brain Banks and Tissue Repositories for Blast-Related Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Research
    Sours, Chandler
    Hinds, Sidney R., II
    McKee, Ann C.
    Perl, Daniel P.
    Leggieri, Michael J., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2017, 34 : S4 - S5
  • [8] Compromised Neurocircuitry in Chronic Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Yeh, Ping-Hong
    Guan Koay, Cheng
    Wang, Binquan
    Morissette, John
    Sham, Elyssa
    Senseney, Justin
    Joy, David
    Kubli, Alex
    Yeh, Chen-Haur
    Eskay, Victora
    Liu, Wei
    French, Louis M.
    Oakes, Terrence R.
    Riedy, Gerard
    Ollinger, John
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2017, 38 (01) : 352 - 369
  • [9] Neuroimaging in Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Mu, Weiya
    Catenaccio, Eva
    Lipton, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2017, 32 (01) : 55 - 69
  • [10] Blast-related traumatic brain injury: What is known?
    Taber, Katherine H.
    Warden, Deborah L.
    Hurley, Robin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2006, 18 (02) : 141 - 145