Evaluating Cultural Impact in Discursive Space through Digital Footprints

被引:3
|
作者
Lopez Baeza, Jesus [1 ]
Bley, Jens [2 ]
Hartkopf, Kay [2 ]
Niggemann, Martin [3 ]
Arias, James [3 ]
Wiedenhoefer, Anais [4 ]
机构
[1] HafenCity Univ, Digital City Sci, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany
[2] HafenCity Univ, ANN RADAR, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany
[3] HafenCity Univ, CityScienceLab, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany
[4] HafenCity Univ, Urban Design, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
smart culture; smart city; digital culture; NLP; Twitter; social media; social networks; NETWORKS; ONLINE; MEDIA;
D O I
10.3390/su13074043
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The research presented in this paper describes an evaluation of the impact of spatial interventions in public spaces, measured by social media data. This contribution aims at observing the way a spatial intervention in an urban location can affect what people talk about on social media. The test site for our research is Domplatz in the center of Hamburg, Germany. In recent years, several actions have taken place there, intending to attract social activity and spotlight the square as a landmark of cultural discourse in the city of Hamburg. To evaluate the impact of this strategy, textual data from the social networks Twitter and Instagram (i.e., tweets and image captions) are collected and analyzed using Natural Language Processing intelligence. These analyses identify and track the cultural topic or "people talking about culture" in the city of Hamburg. We observe the evolution of the cultural topic, and its potential correspondence in levels of activity, with certain intervention actions carried out in Domplatz. Two analytic methods of topic clustering and tracking are tested. The results show a successful topic identification and tracking with both methods, the second one being more accurate. This means that it is possible to isolate and observe the evolution of the city's cultural discourse using NLP. However, it is shown that the effects of spatial interventions in our small test square have a limited local scale, rather than a city-wide relevance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Study of Network Community Capacity to be a Subject: Digital Discursive Footprints
    Voronin, Anatoly N.
    Grebenschikova, Taisiya A.
    Kubrak, Tina A.
    Nestik, Timofey A.
    Pavlova, Natalya D.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (12)
  • [2] Digital Cultural Items in Space: The Impact of Contextual Information on Presenting Digital Cultural Items
    Ferraris, Christopher
    Davis, Tom
    Gatzidis, Christos
    Hargood, Charlie
    [J]. ACM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING AND CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2023, 16 (04):
  • [3] Understanding Learner Lives Through Digital Footprints
    Ng, Elon Y. L.
    Law, Nancy
    Yuen, Allan H. K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TECHNOLOGY, MIND, AND SOCIETY CONFERENCE (TECHMINDSOCIETY'18), 2018,
  • [4] Predicting Loneliness through Digital Footprints on Google and YouTube
    Ahmed, Eiman
    Xue, Liyang
    Sankalp, Aniket
    Kong, Haein
    Matos, Arcadio
    Silenzio, Vincent
    Singh, Vivek K.
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (23)
  • [5] Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment - The cultural politics of discursive space
    Fischer, Frank
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 36 (01): : 19 - 40
  • [7] Cultural Antropologic Reflections In The Digital Space
    Fotache, Doina
    Munteanu, Adrian Bogdanel
    Dospinescu, Octavian
    [J]. BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION THROUGH INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 1241 - 1249
  • [8] Taking the urban tourist activity pulse through digital footprints
    Marti, Pablo
    Garcia-Mayor, Clara
    Serrano-Estrada, Leticia
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2021, 24 (02) : 157 - 176
  • [9] Evaluating the impact of learning space
    Ramsden, Bryony
    [J]. REFERENCE SERVICES REVIEW, 2011, 39 (03) : 451 - +
  • [10] Cinderella or Big Foot? Analysing Size and Impact of Digital Footprints
    Maxwell, Whitney
    Teng, Chia-Chi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL MEDIA, 2016, : 521 - 529