Specialist wait time reporting using family physicians' electronic medical record data: a mixed method study of feasibility and clinical utility

被引:5
|
作者
Naimer, Michelle S. [1 ,2 ]
Aliarzadeh, Babak [2 ]
Bell, Chaim M. [3 ,4 ]
Ivers, Noah [2 ,5 ]
Jaakkimainen, Liisa [2 ,6 ]
McIsaac, Warren [1 ,2 ]
Meaney, Christopher [2 ]
Moineddin, Rahim [2 ]
Permaul, Joanne A. [1 ]
Makuwaza, Tutsirai [5 ]
Kukan, Sahana [1 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hlth, Ray D Wolfe Dept Family Med, 60 Murray St,Box 25, Murray, ON M5T 3L9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sinai Hlth, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2022年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Wait time; Specialist referrals; Primary care;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-022-01679-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background More than 50% of Canadian adult patients wait longer than four weeks to see a specialist after referral from primary care. Access to accurate wait time information may help primary care physicians choose the timeliest specialist to address a patient's specific needs. We conducted a mixed-methods study to assess if primary to specialist care wait times can be extracted from electronic medical records (EMR), analyzed the wait time information, and used focus groups and interviews to assess the potential clinical utility of the wait time information. Methods Two family practices were recruited to examine primary care physician to specialist wait times between January 2016 and December 2017, using EMR data. The primary outcome was the median wait time from physician referral to specialist appointment for each specialty service. Secondary outcomes included the physician and patient characteristics associated with wait times as well as qualitative analyses of physician interviews about the resulting wait time reports. Results Wait time data can be extracted from the primary care EMR and converted to a report format for family physicians and specialists to review. After data cleaning, there were 7141 referrals included from 4967 unique patients. The 5 most common specialties referred to were Dermatology, Gastroenterology, Ear Nose and Throat, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology. Half of the patients were seen by a specialist within 42 days, 75% seen within 80 days and all patients within 760 days. There were significant differences in wait times by specialty, for younger patients, and those with urgently labelled medical situations. Overall, wait time reports were perceived by clinicians to be important since they could help family physicians decide how to triage referrals and might lead to system improvements. Conclusions Wait time information from primary to specialist care can aid in decision-making around specialist referrals, identify bottlenecks, and help with system planning. This mixed method study is a starting point to review the importance of providing wait time data for both family physicians, specialists and local health systems. Future work can be directed towards developing wait time reporting functionality and evaluating if wait time information will help increase system efficiency and/or improve provider and patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Specialist wait time reporting using family physicians’ electronic medical record data: a mixed method study of feasibility and clinical utility
    Michelle S. Naimer
    Babak Aliarzadeh
    Chaim M. Bell
    Noah Ivers
    Liisa Jaakkimainen
    Warren McIsaac
    Christopher Meaney
    Rahim Moineddin
    Joanne A. Permaul
    Tutsirai Makuwaza
    Sahana Kukan
    BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [2] Electronic Medical Record in Private Practice: A Method of Collecting and Reporting Outcomes Data
    Patalano, K. K.
    Martin, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2014, 29 (05) : 394 - 394
  • [3] Using an electronic medical record (EMR) to conduct clinical trials: Salford Lung Study feasibility
    Elkhenini, Hanaa F.
    Davis, Kourtney J.
    Stein, Norman D.
    New, John P.
    Delderfield, Mark R.
    Gibson, Martin
    Vestbo, Jorgen
    Woodcock, Ashley
    Bakerly, Nawar Diar
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
  • [4] Using an electronic medical record (EMR) to conduct clinical trials: Salford Lung Study feasibility
    Hanaa F Elkhenini
    Kourtney J Davis
    Norman D Stein
    John P New
    Mark R Delderfield
    Martin Gibson
    Jorgen Vestbo
    Ashley Woodcock
    Nawar Diar Bakerly
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15
  • [5] Answering family physicians' clinical questions using electronic medical databases
    Alper, BS
    Stevermer, JJ
    White, DS
    Ewigman, BG
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2001, 50 (11): : 960 - 965
  • [6] Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study
    Wei Wei Lee
    Maria A. Alkureishi
    Obioma Ukabiala
    Laura Ruth Venable
    Samantha S. Ngooi
    Daina D. Staisiunas
    Kristen E. Wroblewski
    Vineet M. Arora
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 1315 - 1322
  • [7] Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study
    Lee, Wei Wei
    Alkureishi, Maria A.
    Ukabiala, Obioma
    Venable, Laura Ruth
    Ngooi, Samantha S.
    Staisiunas, Daina D.
    Wroblewski, Kristen E.
    Arora, Vineet M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (11) : 1315 - 1322
  • [8] Third Place: Electronic Medical Record In Private Practice: A Method of Collecting and Reporting Outcomes Data
    Patalano, Karen
    Martin, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2016, 31 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [9] Clinical Hypnosis in Medical Care: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study
    Lind, Sofie Bulling
    Jacobsen, Henrik Borsting
    Solbakken, Ole Andre
    Reme, Silje Endresen
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2021, 20
  • [10] Family Practice Physicians' Acceptance and Use of a Replacement Electronic Medical Record System: An Instrumental Case Study
    Berich, Diana
    Kovacich, Joann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2020, 19