Morphine or Oxycodone for Cancer-Related Pain? A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial

被引:49
|
作者
Riley, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Branford, Ruth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Droney, Joanne [1 ,2 ]
Gretton, Sophy [1 ,2 ]
Sato, Hiroe [2 ]
Kennett, Alison [1 ,2 ]
Oyebode, Christina [1 ]
Thick, Michael [1 ]
Wells, Athol
Williams, John [1 ]
Welsh, Ken [2 ]
Ross, Joy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] St Josephs Hosp, London, England
关键词
Morphine; oxycodone; opioid switching; cancer-related pain; PALLIATIVE CARE; OPIOID ANALGESICS; GENETIC-VARIATION; ORAL MORPHINE; MANAGEMENT; ROTATION; MODERATE; THERAPY; SWITCH; STILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.021
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. There is wide interindividual variation in response to morphine for cancer-related pain; 30% of patients do not have a good therapeutic outcome. Alternative opioids such as oxycodone are increasingly being used, and opioid switching has become common clinical practice. Objectives. To compare clinical response to oral morphine vs. oral oxycodone when used as first-line or second-line (after switching) treatment in patients with cancer-related pain. Methods. In this prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (ISRCTN65155201) with a selected crossover phase, patients with cancer-related pain were randomized to receive either oral morphine or oxycodone as first-line treatment. Dose was individually titrated until the patient reported adequate pain control. Patients who did not respond to the first-line opioid (either because of inadequate analgesia or unacceptable adverse effects) were switched to the alternative opioid. Results. Two hundred patients were recruited. On intention-to-treat analysis (n = 198, morphine 98, oxycodone 100), there was no significant difference between the numbers of patients responding to morphine (61/98 = 62%) or oxycodone (67/100 = 67%) when used as a first-line opioid. Similarly, there was no significant difference in subsequent response when patients were switched to either morphine (8/12 = 67%) or oxycodone (11/21 = 52%). Per-protocol analysis demonstrated a 95% response rate when both opioids were available. There was no difference in adverse reaction scores between morphine and oxycodone either in first-line responders or nonresponders. Conclusion. In this population, there was no difference between analgesic response or adverse reactions to oral morphine and oxycodone when used as a first-or second-line opioid. These data provide evidence to support opioid switching to improve outcomes. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 172
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Tolerability Profile of Controlled-Release Oral Morphine and Oxycodone for Cancer Pain Treatment. An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zecca, Ernesto
    Brunelli, Cinzia
    Bracchi, Paola
    Biancofiore, Giuseppe
    De Sangro, Carlo
    Bortolussi, Roberto
    Montanari, Luigi
    Maltoni, Marco
    Moro, Cecilia
    Colonna, Ugo
    Finco, Gabriele
    Roy, Maria Teresa
    Ferrari, Vittorio
    Alabiso, Oscar
    Rosti, Giovanni
    Kaasa, Stein
    Caraceni, Augusto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : 783 - +
  • [2] Open-Label Placebo Treatment for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Teri W. Hoenemeyer
    Ted J. Kaptchuk
    Tapan S. Mehta
    Kevin R. Fontaine
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [3] Open-Label Placebo Treatment for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Hoenemeyer, Teri W.
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Mehta, Tapan S.
    Fontaine, Kevin R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [4] Open-Label Placebo for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Fatigue in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yennurajalingam, Sriram
    Azhar, Ahsan
    Lu, Zhanni
    Rodriguez, Ashley J.
    Arechiga, Adrienne B.
    Guerra-Sanchez, Maria
    Stanton, Penny
    Andersen, Clark R.
    Urbauer, Diana L.
    Bruera, Eduardo
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (12): : 1081 - 1089
  • [5] Oxycodone for cancer-related pain - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Reid, CM
    Martin, RM
    Sterne, JAC
    Davies, AN
    Hanks, GW
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (08) : 837 - 843
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of sustained-release oxycodone compared with immediate-release morphine for pain titration in cancer patients A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (SOCIAL)
    Pan, Hongming
    Shen, Peng
    Shu, Qijin
    Lu, Liqin
    Qian, Suying
    Zhou, Yuefen
    Han, Feng
    Guo, Qunyi
    Yang, Zhiping
    Pan, Jie
    Xu, Qing
    Zhang, Peng
    Wang, Kaifeng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (24)
  • [7] Selection of opioids for cancer-related pain using a biomarker: a randomized, multi-institutional, open-label trial (RELIEF study)
    Hiromichi Matsuoka
    Junji Tsurutani
    Yasutaka Chiba
    Yoshihiko Fujita
    Masato Terashima
    Takeshi Yoshida
    Kiyohiro Sakai
    Yoichi Otake
    Atsuko Koyama
    Kazuto Nishio
    Kazuhiko Nakagawa
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 17
  • [8] Selection of opioids for cancer-related pain using a biomarker: a randomized, multi-institutional, open-label trial (RELIEF study)
    Matsuoka, Hiromichi
    Tsurutani, Junji
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    Fujita, Yoshihiko
    Terashima, Masato
    Yoshida, Takeshi
    Sakai, Kiyohiro
    Otake, Yoichi
    Koyama, Atsuko
    Nishio, Kazuto
    Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [9] Oxycodone for cancer-related pain
    Schmidt-Hansen, Mia
    Bennett, Michael I.
    Arnold, Stephanie
    Bromham, Nathan
    Hilgart, Jennifer S.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (02):
  • [10] Oxycodone for cancer-related pain
    Schmidt-Hansen, Mia
    Bennett, Michael, I
    Arnold, Stephanie
    Bromham, Nathan
    Hilgart, Jennifer S.
    Page, Andrew J.
    Chi, Yuan
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (06):