The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Group Schema Therapy Rating Scale - Revised

被引:4
|
作者
Bastick, Emily [1 ]
Bot, Suili [2 ]
Verhagen, Simone J. W. [2 ]
Zarbock, Gerhard [3 ]
Farrell, Joan [4 ,5 ]
Brand-de Wilde, Odette [6 ,7 ]
Arntz, Arnoud [6 ]
Lee, Christopher William [8 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] IVAH Inst Verhaltenstherapie Ausbildung, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[5] Ctr Borderline Personal Disorder Treatment & Res, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Viersprong, Halsteren, Netherlands
[8] Univ Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
关键词
group schema therapy; treatment adherence; treatment competence; fidelity; reliability; psychometric; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1017/S1352465817000741
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Recent research has supported the efficacy of schema therapy as a treatment for personality disorders. A group format has been developed (group schema therapy; GST), which has been suggested to improve both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the treatment. Aims: Efficacy studies of GST need to assess treatment fidelity. The aims of the present study were to improve, describe and evaluate a fidelity measure for GST, the Group Schema Therapy Rating Scale - Revised (GSTRS-R). Method: Following a pilot study on an initial version of the scale (GSTRS), items were revised and guidelines were modified in order to improve the reliability of the scale. Students highly experienced with the scale rated recorded GST therapy sessions using the GSTRS-R in addition to a group cohesion measure, the Harvard Community Health Plan Group Cohesiveness Scale - II (GCS-II). The scores were used to assess internal consistency and inter-rater reliability. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the scores on the GSTRS-R with the GCS-II. Results: The GSTRS-R displayed substantial internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, and adequate discriminate validity, evidenced by a weak positive correlation with the GCS-II. Conclusions: Overall, the GSTRS-R is a reliable tool that may be useful for evaluating therapist fidelity to GST model, and assisting GST training and supervision. Initial validity was supported by a weak association with GCS-II, indicating that although associated with cohesiveness, the instrument also assesses factors specific to GST. Limitations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 618
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Clericalism Observer Rating Scale
    Burnham, Martin J.
    Fox, Jesse
    Fenzel, Leo Mickey
    Stewart-Sicking, Joseph
    Sivo, Stephen
    [J]. SPIRITUALITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 7 (04) : 310 - 325
  • [2] The Breast Size Rating Scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
    Swami, Viren
    Cavelti, Silvia
    Taylor, Donna
    Tovee, Martin J.
    [J]. BODY IMAGE, 2015, 14 : 29 - 38
  • [3] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Revised Sense of Coherence Scale
    Bachem, Rahel
    Maercker, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 34 (03) : 206 - 215
  • [4] Psychometric properties of the revised mathematics anxiety rating scale
    Baloglu, Mustafa
    Zelhart, Paul F.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2007, 57 (04): : 593 - 611
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of the Revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale
    Mustafa Baloğlu
    Paul F. Zelhart
    [J]. The Psychological Record, 2007, 57 : 593 - 611
  • [6] Development and psychometric evaluation of the revised university student hassles scale
    Pett, MA
    Johnson, MJM
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 65 (06) : 984 - 1010
  • [7] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale
    Madson, Michael B.
    Arnau, Randolph C.
    Lambert, Sasha J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 25 (02) : 556 - 567
  • [8] Psychometric Evaluation of the Characteristics of Delusions Rating Scale as an Expert Rating Scale
    Gentner, Nana Christina
    Bueche, Liesa
    von Bock, Anique
    Rueckl, Sarah
    Marx, Jens
    Kaiser, Stephan
    Barthel, Andreas
    Vedder, Helmut
    Mundt, Christoph
    Kronmueller, Klaus-Thomas
    [J]. PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 43 (06) : 373 - 380
  • [9] The psychometric and pragmatic evidence rating scale (PAPERS) for measure development and evaluation
    Lewis, Cara C.
    Mettert, Kayne D.
    Stanick, Cameo F.
    Halko, Heather M.
    Nolen, Elspeth A.
    Powell, Byron J.
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 2
  • [10] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-Revised
    Weis, Darlene
    Schank, Mary Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2009, 17 (03) : 221 - 231