Comparison of Decision-Making Processes Between Subjects with a Positive and Negative History of Substance Use

被引:0
|
作者
Sisakht, Reza Rastgoo [1 ]
Negarandeh, Rahimeh [2 ]
Valizadegan, Hamid [3 ]
Mousavi, Shabnam [4 ]
Noroozian, Maryam [5 ]
Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi [1 ,6 ]
Razaghi, Emran [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Adv Technol Med, Dept Neurosci & Addict Studies, Tehran, Iran
[2] MSF, Southern Tehran Project, Tehran, Iran
[3] Behsazan Mellat Co, Tehran, Iran
[4] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Ruzbeh Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Memory & Behav Neurol Div, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Res Ctr Cognit & Behav Studies, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Tehran, Iran
[7] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Adv Technol, Tehran, Iran
[8] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Decision-Making; Choice; Process Tracing; Substance Use; Decision-Making Software; SELF-REGULATION FAILURE; INFORMATION ACQUISITION; IMPULSE CONTROL; TIME PRESSURE; ADDICTION; CHOICE; STRATEGIES; DEPLETION; RESPONSES; COCAINE;
D O I
10.5812/ijpbs.92711
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Studies related to decision-making and choice preference in substance use behavior have less commonly focused on decision-making processes per se. Those processes include decision-making time, task-based complexity, and decision-making strategies. Objectives: The objectives of this study was the production of a culturally modified version of the Mouselab tool for measurement of decision-making processes and to measure differences between decision-making processes in subjects with a positive and negative history of substance use. Methods: Applying a snowball method for sampling, two groups, of individuals with a positive and negative history of substance use were recruited. The case and control groups consisted of 17 males with the mean age of 35.94 (+/- 12) and 33.8 (+/- 8.83) years, respectively. The measurement tool was a modified version of Mouselab computer game. Results: Using repeated measurement analysis of variances ant t-test with non-paired groups for comparing the case and control groups, it was found that the group with a positive history of substance use had a longer time-lapse in the decision-making process (P = 0.029). The accuracy of choice, however, was not different between the groups (P = 0.172). Conclusions: Subjects with a positive history of substance use were different in two stages of decision-making process, which are dependent on the ecology and conditions of decision-making process, namely, search for information and decision-making. Two other stages of decision-making process that were dependent on individual cognitive and logical properties, i.e., stop search and choice, were not different in subjects with a positive history of substance use compared to the control group. Although subjects with a positive history of substance use consumed more resources for decision-making, their accuracy of choice was not different from the control group, thereby, ruling out a decision-making-related cognitive deficit.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Substance Use Decision-Making - Are Clinicians Using the Evidence?
    Stokes, Jackie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SERVICE RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [2] Behavioral and neural substrates of decision-making processes in adolescents as potential markers of risk for substance use
    Ernst, Monique
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 31 : S36 - S37
  • [3] Differences between men and women in decision-making processes in patients with substance-related disorders
    Pinon Blanco, Adolfo
    Vergara Moragues, Esperanza
    Torres Rincon, Tania
    Gutierrez Martinez, Olga
    Conde Amado, Manuel
    Vazquez Justo, Enrique
    Otero Lamas, Francisco
    [J]. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2018, 50 (03): : 160 - 169
  • [4] Prescreening of choice options in 'positive' and 'negative' decision-making tasks
    Levin, IP
    Prosansky, CM
    Heller, D
    Brunick, BM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 14 (04) : 279 - 293
  • [5] Neurobiological Models of Risky Decision-Making and Adolescent Substance Use
    Reyna V.F.
    [J]. Current Addiction Reports, 2018, 5 (2) : 128 - 133
  • [6] Decision-Making and History
    Hoffmann-Rehnitz, Philip
    Krischer, Andre
    Pohlig, Matthias
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2018, 45 (02): : 217 - 281
  • [7] USE OF THE BELIEF THEORY TO FORMALIZE AGENT DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES: APPLICATION TO CROPPING PLAN DECISION-MAKING
    Taillandier, Patrick
    Therond, Olivier
    [J]. EUROPEAN SIMULATION AND MODELLING CONFERENCE 2011, 2011, : 138 - +
  • [8] Exploring Police Use of Force Decision-Making Processes and Impairments Using a Naturalistic Decision-Making Approach
    Hine, Kelly A.
    Porter, Louise E.
    Westera, Nina J.
    Alpert, Geoffrey P.
    Allen, Andrea
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 45 (11) : 1782 - 1801
  • [9] Differences Between Experts and Novices in Decision-making Processes
    Santos, Eugene, Jr.
    Kim, Keum Joo
    Nguyen, Hien
    [J]. UNMANNED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY XXII, 2020, 11425
  • [10] A Study of Decision-Making Processes
    Ritea, Ana-Maria
    Stoian, Sorina Mihaela
    [J]. INNOVATION VISION 2020: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOL I-VI, 2015, : 3213 - 3222