Preference-based Glaucoma-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instrument: Development of the Health Utility for Glaucoma

被引:5
|
作者
Muratov, Sergei [1 ]
Podbielski, Dominik W. [5 ,6 ]
Kennedy, Kevin [1 ]
Jack, Susan M. [2 ]
Pemberton, Julia [1 ]
Ahmed, Iqbal I. K. [5 ,6 ]
Baltaziak, Monika [5 ]
Xie, Feng [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Res Inst St Josephs Hamilton, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Program Hlth Econ & Outcome Measures, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Trillium Hlth Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
关键词
glaucoma; preference-based measure; Health Utility for Glaucoma (HUG5); health utility; maximum variation; patient reported outcome; descriptive system; utility based instrument; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; INDEX; EQ-5D-3L;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0000000000000984
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To develop a descriptive system for a glaucoma-specific preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument: the Health Utility for Glaucoma (HUG-5).Methods:The descriptive system was developed in 2 stages: item identification and item selection. A systematic literature review of HRQoL assessment of glaucoma was conducted using a comprehensive search strategy. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit patients with different clinical characteristics. Relevant items were presented to glaucoma patients through face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Framework methodology was applied to analyze interview content. The recurring themes identified through an iterative content analysis represented topics of most importance and relevance to patients. These themes formed the domains of the HUG-5 descriptive system. Three versions of the descriptive system, differing in explanatory detail, were pilot tested using a focus group.Results:The literature review identified 19 articles which contained 266 items. These items were included for the full-text review and were used to develop an interview guide. From 12 patient interviews, 22 themes were identified and grouped into 5 domains that informed the 5 questions of the descriptive system. The HUG-5 measures visual discomfort, mobility, daily life activities, emotional well-being, and social activities. Each question has 5 response levels that range from no problem to severe problem. The focus group comprised 7 additional patients unanimously preferred the version that contained detailed, specific examples to support each question.Conclusions:A 5-domain descriptive system of a glaucoma-specific preference-based instrument, the HUG-5, was developed and remains to be evaluated for validity and reliability in the glaucoma patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 591
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for glaucoma: a mixed methods study protocol
    Muratov, Sergei
    Podbielski, Dominik W.
    Jack, Susan M.
    Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
    Mitchell, Levine A. H.
    Baltaziak, Monika
    Xie, Feng
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [2] The effect of glaucoma-specific symptoms and functioning on vision-targeted health-related quality of life
    Gutierrez, PR
    Mangione, CM
    Gordon, M
    Cioffi, GA
    Ritch, R
    Sherwood, M
    Wilson, MR
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 3365 - 3365
  • [3] The development of a glaucoma-specific health-related quality of life item bank supporting a novel computerized adaptive testing system in Asia
    Eva K. Fenwick
    Belicia Lim
    Ryan E. K. Man
    Mani Baskaran
    Monisha E. Nongpiur
    Chelvin C. A. Sng
    Jayant V. Iyer
    Rahat Husain
    Shamira A. Perera
    Tina T. Wong
    Jin Rong Low
    Olivia Huang Shimin
    Katherine Lun
    Tin Aung
    Ecosse L. Lamoureux
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [4] The development of a glaucoma-specific health-related quality of life item bank supporting a novel computerized adaptive testing system in Asia
    Fenwick, Eva K.
    Lim, Belicia
    Man, Ryan E. K.
    Baskaran, Mani
    Nongpiur, Monisha E.
    Sng, Chelvin C. A.
    Iyer, Jayant, V
    Husain, Rahat
    Perera, Shamira A.
    Wong, Tina T.
    Low, Jin Rong
    Shimin, Olivia Huang
    Lun, Katherine
    Aung, Tin
    Lamoureux, Ecosse L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [5] Development and initial validation of a new preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for erectile function
    G.W. Torrance
    M.A. Keresteci
    R.W. Casey
    A.J. Rosner
    N. Ryan
    M.C. Breton
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2004, 13 : 349 - 359
  • [6] Development and initial validation of a new preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for erectile function
    Torrance, GW
    Keresteci, MA
    Casey, RW
    Rosner, AJ
    Ryan, N
    Breton, MC
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) : 349 - 359
  • [7] Health-related quality-of-life and utility in Dutch glaucoma patients
    Van Gestel, A.
    Schouten, J. S.
    Webers, C. A.
    Beckers, H. J.
    Schrooten, M. A.
    Severens, J. L.
    Hendrikse, F.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A373 - A373
  • [8] Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Contributors According to a Preference-Based Generic Instrument in Cirrhosis
    Hui, Yangyang
    Li, Nan
    Yu, Zihan
    Li, Chaoqun
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Li, Yifan
    Sun, Mingyu
    Yang, Wanting
    Guo, Gaoyue
    Fan, Xiaofei
    Lin, Lin
    Cui, Binxin
    Chen, Xin
    Wang, Bangmao
    Zhang, Jie
    Sun, Chao
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 6 (03) : 610 - 620
  • [9] Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life
    Lenert, L
    Kaplan, RM
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (09) : 138 - 150
  • [10] Preference-based health-related quality of life among victims of bullying
    Beckman, Linda
    Svensson, Mikael
    Frisen, Ann
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (02) : 303 - 309