Failure to rescue patients after emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation: analysis of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA)

被引:2
|
作者
Peacock, O. [1 ]
Yanni, F. [2 ]
Kuryba, A. [3 ]
Cromwell, D. [3 ,4 ]
Lockwood, S. [5 ]
Anderson, I [6 ]
Vohra, R. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Trent Oesophagogastr Unit, Nottingham City Hosp Campus,Hucknall Rd, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[3] Royal Coll Surgeons England, Clin Effectiveness Unit, London, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[5] Bradford Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bradford Royal Infirm, Colorectal Surg Dept, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Manchester Sch Med, Salford Royal NHS Fdn Trust, Salford, Lancs, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
TO-RESCUE; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PROGNOSTIC FACTORS; CANCER-SURGERY; CARE; QUALITY; PREVENTABILITY; COMPLICATIONS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zraa060
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Past studies have highlighted variation in in-hospital mortality rates among hospitals performing emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether failure to rescue (FTR) contributes to this variability. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or over requiring surgery for large bowel perforation between 2013 and 2016 were extracted from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database. Information on complications were identified using linked Hospital Episode Statistics data and in-hospital deaths from the Office for National Statistics. The FTR rate was defined as the proportion of patients dying in hospital with a recorded complication, and was examined in hospitals grouped as having low, medium or high overall postoperative mortality. Results: Overall, 6413 patients were included with 1029 (16.0 per cent) in-hospital deaths. Some 3533 patients (55.1 per cent) had at least one complication: 1023 surgical (16.0 per cent) and 3332 medical (52.0 per cent) complications. There were 22 in-hospital deaths following a surgical complication alone, 685 deaths following a medical complication alone, 150 deaths following both a surgical and medical complication, and 172 deaths with no recorded complication. The risk of in-hospital death was high among patients who suffered either type of complication (857 deaths in 3533 patients; FTR rate 24.3 per cent): 172 deaths followed a surgical complication (FTR-surgical rate 16.8 per cent) and 835 deaths followed a medical complication (FTR-medical rate of 25.1 per cent). After adjustment for patient characteristics and hospital factors, hospitals grouped as having low, medium or high overall postoperative mortality did not have different FTR rates (P=0.770). Conclusion: Among patients having emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation, efforts to reduce the risk of in-hospital death should focus on reducing avoidable complications. There was no evidence of variation in FTR rates across National Health Service hospitals in England.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failure to Rescue Following Emergency Laparotomy for Large Bowel Perforation
    Yanni, Fady
    Peacock, Olliver
    Kuryba, Angela
    Cromwell, David
    Lockwood, Sonia
    Vohra, Ravinder
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 64 - 64
  • [2] Life after NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) with a bag?
    Husain, Omer
    Jenner, Deborah
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 106 - 106
  • [3] A Retrospective Analysis of National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) Data at a Tertiary Hospital
    Omran, K.
    Aftab, M.
    Wheatstone, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [4] Is this National Emergency Laparotomy Audit? A National Emergency Laparotomy Audit awareness project
    Selvarajah, S.
    Tanqueray, T.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 : 98 - 98
  • [5] Older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: observations from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) years 1-4
    Aitken, Rachel M.
    Partridge, Judith S. L.
    Oliver, Charles Matthew
    Murray, Dave
    Hare, Sarah
    Lockwood, Sonia
    Beckley-Hoelscher, Nick
    Dhesi, Jugdeep K.
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2020, 49 (04) : 656 - 663
  • [6] Older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy - Observations from the UK National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) Years 1-4
    Aitken, Rachel
    Partridge, Judith
    Oliver, Charles Matt
    Murray, Dave
    Hare, Sarah
    Lockwood, Sonia
    Beckley--Hoelscher, Nick
    Dhesi, Jugdeep
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2021, 40 : 20 - 20
  • [7] Postoperative Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy: A 9-Year Cohort Study of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA)
    Mughal, Hanaa N.
    Bughio, Mumtaz
    Gok, Muhammed A.
    Khan, Usman A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S166 - S167
  • [8] Are We Meeting The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) Consultant Standards?
    Reeds, M.
    Taylor, F.
    Andreani, S.
    Thunga, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 176 - 176
  • [9] Comparison of the clinical frailty score (CFS) to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) risk calculator in all patients undergoing emergency laparotomy
    Palaniappan, Subbra
    Soiza, Roy L.
    Duffy, Siobhan
    Moug, Susan J.
    Myint, Phyo Kyaw
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (06) : 782 - 789
  • [10] Audit for evaluation of using the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) as risk assessment calculator for high-risk surgical patients undergoing emergency laparotomy
    Hobeita, Wesam
    Mohamed, Hussam
    Karar, Karar
    Di-Rollo, Domenic
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110