Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects

被引:8
|
作者
Janczyk, Markus [1 ]
Xiong, Aiping [2 ]
Proctor, Robert W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychol, Schleichstr 4, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
display-control compatibility; stimulus-response compatibility; interface design; S-R COMPATIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0018720819831814
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether response-effect (R-E) compatibility or stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility is more critical for touchless gesture responses. Background: Content on displays can be moved in the same direction (S-R incompatible but R-E compatible) or opposite direction (S-R compatible but R-E incompatible) as the touchless gesture that produces the movement. Previous studies suggested that it is easier to produce a button-press response when it is R-E compatible (and S-R incompatible). However, whether this R-E compatibility effect also occurs for touchless gesture responses is unknown. Method: Experiments 1 and 2 employed an R-E compatibility manipulation in which participants made responses with an upward or downward touchless gesture that resulted in the display content moving in the same (compatible) or opposite (incompatible) direction. Experiment 3 employed an S-R compatibility manipulation in which the stimulus occurred at the upper or lower location on the screen. Results: Overall, only negligible influences of R-E compatibility on performing the touchless gestures were observed (in contrast to button-press responses), whereas S-R compatibility heavily affected the gestural responses. Conclusion: The R-E compatibility obtained in many previous studies with various types of responses appears not to hold for touchless gestures as responses. Application: The results suggest that in the design of touchless interfaces, unique factors may contribute to determining which mappings of gesture and display movements are preferred by users.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1314
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual Response-Effect Congruencies Modulate Subsequent Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects
    Miles, James D.
    Vu, Kim-Phuong L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 134 (01): : 31 - 43
  • [2] Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition
    Verbruggen, F
    Liefooghe, B
    Notebaert, W
    Vandierendonck, A
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2005, 120 (03) : 307 - 326
  • [3] Stimulus-response compatibility is information-action compatibility
    Stins, JF
    Michaels, CF
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 9 (01) : 25 - 45
  • [4] STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY EFFECT RECONSIDERED
    COTTON, B
    TZENG, OJL
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1977, 10 (04) : 245 - 245
  • [5] Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Yang Seok Cho
    Robert W. Proctor
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 45 - 73
  • [6] Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Cho, YS
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (01) : 45 - 73
  • [7] Stimulus-response compatibility: The effects of dynamic stimuli
    Lane, CA
    Fischman, MG
    Reeve, TG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 23 : S86 - S86
  • [8] On the relation between object and action: Response consistency and stimulus-response compatibility
    Hibi, Yuko
    Yokosawa, Kazuhiko
    [J]. VISUAL COGNITION, 2007, 15 (03) : 349 - 380
  • [9] Temporal stimulus-response compatibility
    Grosjean, M
    Mordkoff, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (04) : 870 - 878
  • [10] Compatibility in Stimulus-Response Coupling
    Weeks, D. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S3 - S3