"Participant" Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics

被引:252
|
作者
Fiesler, Casey [1 ]
Proferes, Nicholas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Informat Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Sch Informat Sci, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
来源
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY | 2018年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
Twitter; Internet research ethics; social media; user studies; PRIVACY; CONTEXT; USERS;
D O I
10.1177/2056305118763366
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Social computing systems such as Twitter present new research sites that have provided billions of data points to researchers. However, the availability of public social media data has also presented ethical challenges. As the research community works to create ethical norms, we should be considering users' concerns as well. With this in mind, we report on an exploratory survey of Twitter users' perceptions of the use of tweets in research. Within our survey sample, few users were previously aware that their public tweets could be used by researchers, and the majority felt that researchers should not be able to use tweets without consent. However, we find that these attitudes are highly contextual, depending on factors such as how the research is conducted or disseminated, who is conducting it, and what the study is about. The findings of this study point to potential best practices for researchers conducting observation and analysis of public data.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research Ethics of Twitter for MOOCs
    Costello, Eamon
    Donlon, Enda
    Brown, Mark
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2019, 23 (03): : 252 - 269
  • [2] The ethics of participant-led biomedical research
    Vayena, Effy
    Tasioulas, John
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (09) : 786 - 787
  • [3] Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives
    Michelle Wallace
    Neroli Sheldon
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 128 : 267 - 277
  • [4] The ethics of participant-led biomedical research
    Effy Vayena
    John Tasioulas
    [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31 : 786 - 787
  • [5] Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives
    Wallace, Michelle
    Sheldon, Neroli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 128 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [6] A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics
    Zimmer, Michael
    Proferes, Nicholas John
    [J]. ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 66 (03) : 250 - 261
  • [7] Responsive Ethics: navigating the fluid research space between HREC ethics, researcher ethics and participant ethics
    Amundsen, Diana
    Msoroka, Mohamed
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2021, 73 (05) : 563 - 579
  • [8] Participant Perceptions of the Faculty Development Educational Research Series
    Dalgarno, Nancy
    Laverty, Corinne
    Egan, Ryan
    Soleas, Eleftherios
    Garton, Kendall
    Babando, Jordan
    van Wylick, Richard
    [J]. TEACHING & LEARNING INQUIRY-THE ISSOTL JOURNAL, 2020, 8 (01): : 221 - 245
  • [9] Research participant compensation: A matter of statistical inference as well as ethics
    Swanson, David M.
    Betensky, Rebecca A.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 45 : 265 - 269
  • [10] Improving Research Participant Ethics: The Utility of an Online Educational Module
    Barber, Larissa K.
    Bailey, Sarah F.
    Bagsby, Patricia G.
    [J]. TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 42 (02) : 143 - 148