A value creation model from science-society interconnections: Archetypal analysis combining publications, survey and altmetric data

被引:3
|
作者
Ramos-Vielba, Irene [1 ]
Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas [2 ]
Woolley, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Danish Ctr Studies Res & Res Policy, Dept Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Univ Granada, Informat & Commun Studies Dept, EC3 Res Grp, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, INGENIO CSIC UPV, Valencia, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 06期
关键词
SOCIAL MEDIA; PRODUCTIVE INTERACTIONS; RESEARCH IMPACT; UNIVERSITY; GOVERNMENT; INNOVATION; COLLABORATION; ENLIGHTENMENT; POLICY; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0269004
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The interplay between science and society takes place through a wide range of intertwined relationships and mutual influences that shape each other and facilitate continuous knowledge flows. Stylised consequentialist perspectives on valuable knowledge moving from public science to society in linear and recursive pathways, whilst informative, cannot fully capture the broad spectrum of value creation possibilities. As an alternative we experiment with an approach that gathers together diverse science-society interconnections and reciprocal research-related knowledge processes that can generate valorisation. Our approach to value creation attempts to incorporate multiple facets, directions and dynamics in which constellations of scientific and societal actors generate value from research. The paper develops a conceptual model based on a set of nine value components derived from four key research-related knowledge processes: production, translation, communication, and utilization. The paper conducts an exploratory empirical study to investigate whether a set of archetypes can be discerned among these components that structure science-society interconnections. We explore how such archetypes vary between major scientific fields. Each archetype is overlaid on a research topic map, with our results showing the distinctive topic areas that correspond to different archetypes. The paper finishes by discussing the significance and limitations of our results and the potential of both our model and our empirical approach for further research.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据