Distributive fairness as a criterion for sustainability: evaluative measures and application to project selection

被引:6
|
作者
Lence, BJ
Furst, J
Matheson, SM
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Civil Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ Agr Sci, Inst Water Management Hydrol & Hydraul Engn, Vienna, Austria
[3] Acres Int Ltd, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
sustainability; decision-making; criteria; distributive fairness;
D O I
10.1080/13504509709469960
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In evaluating civil engineering projects and management alternatives, the distribution of project impacts among groups in the same generation (intratemporal impact distributions) and between groups in different generations (intertemporal impact distributions) may be used as indicators of project viability and potential sustainability. Empirical measures of distributive fairness among groups at one point in time have typically been applied in project selection. These measures are often based on one of three views of fairness, namely allocation of impacts based on equality, equity, or need. The appropriateness of these measures for different applications may be determined based on whether they meet a set of required characteristics. This paper classifies the common distributive fairness measures for impact distributions at one point in time, describes the required characteristics of each measure, and extends these measures for considering impact distributions that are experienced over time. New measures of intratemporal and intertemporal distributive fairness are suggested and the challenge of evaluating these in a long time horizon is discussed. The application of distributive fairness measures to the selection of an electricity supply project is then presented.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 258
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distributive fairness considerations in sustainable project selection
    Matheson, S
    Lence, B
    Furst, J
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1997, 42 (04): : 531 - 548
  • [2] Distributive fairness considerations in sustainable project selection
    Matheson, S.
    Lence, B.
    Furst, J.
    Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1997, 42 (04) : 531 - 548
  • [3] Reversibility as a sustainability criterion for project selection
    Fanai, N
    Burn, DH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 1997, 4 (04): : 259 - 273
  • [4] APPLICATION OF STATISTICAL GRAPHICS TO FACILITATE SELECTION OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES FOR EVALUATIVE RESEARCH
    STUCKI, G
    LIANG, MH
    STUCKI, S
    KATZ, JN
    LEW, RA
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (09): : 145 - 145
  • [5] Application of Statistical Graphics to Facilitate Selection of Health Status Measures for Clinical Practice and Evaluative Research
    G. Stucki
    M. H. Liang
    S. Stucki
    J. N. Katz
    R. A. Lew
    Clinical Rheumatology, 1999, 18 : 101 - 105
  • [6] Application of statistical graphics to facilitate selection of health status measures for clinical practice and evaluative research
    Stucki, G
    Liang, MH
    Stucki, S
    Katz, JN
    Lew, RA
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 18 (02) : 101 - 105
  • [7] Flatness Is a Criterion for Selection of Maximizing Measures
    Leplaideur, Renaud
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 147 (04) : 728 - 757
  • [8] Flatness Is a Criterion for Selection of Maximizing Measures
    Renaud Leplaideur
    Journal of Statistical Physics, 2012, 147 : 728 - 757
  • [9] Fairness of Academic Performance Prediction for the Distribution of Support Measures for Students: Differences in Perceived Fairness of Distributive Justice Norms
    Luenich, Marco
    Keller, Birte
    Marcinkowski, Frank
    TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2024, 29 (02) : 1079 - 1107
  • [10] Fairness and Desert: A Critique of the Random Selection Criterion in Clinical Trials
    Nakazawa, Eisuke
    Yamamoto, Keiichiro
    Akabayashi, Akira
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (04): : 81 - 82