Low working memory load facilitates attention bias modification training

被引:3
|
作者
Yap, David [1 ]
Denefrio, Samantha [1 ,2 ]
Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Hunter Coll, Dept Psychol, 695 Pk Ave,611HN, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Attentional bias; Attention bias modification training (ABMT); Working memory load (WML); Anxiety; Cognitive; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; BASE-LINE; ANXIETY; THREAT; PERFORMANCE; CAPACITY; FUTURE; TASK; UNRELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2021.103828
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Implementations of attention bias modification training (ABMT) attempt to retrain attention away from rather than towards threat, thereby disrupting the anxiety-related attentional bias (AB). Yet, results of ABMT studies have been mixed due to limitations in knowledge of mechanisms underlying ABMT efficacy. Dual-process models of anxiety posit that ABMT works primarily through strengthening of the top-down cognitive control of attention to threat. If this is the case, introducing a working memory load (WML) during ABMT should reduce training efficacy. However, prior studies employing this method show mixed results (Booth, Mackintosh, Mobini, Oztop, & Nunn, 2014; Clarke et al., 2017) and fail to directly compare low and high WML with no WML or to account for individual differences in anxiety and working memory capacity (WMC). The present study (N = 306) assessed trait anxiety and WMC in neurotypical adults who were then randomly assigned to ABMT that trained attention toward or away from threat, with either no, low, or high WML, for a total of six training groups. Attentional bias was assessed before and after training. Results showed ABMT successfully trained attention under low WML, but not under high or no WML, suggesting that ABMT is facilitated by engaging but not overtaxing WML.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Attention bias modification training under working memory load increases the magnitude of change in attentional bias
    Clarke, Patrick J. F.
    Branson, Sonya
    Chen, Nigel T. M.
    Van Bockstaele, Bram
    Salemink, Elske
    MacLeod, Colin
    Notebaert, Lies
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 57 : 25 - 31
  • [2] Cognitive Bias Modification of Attention is Less Effective Under Working Memory Load
    Booth, Robert W.
    Mackintosh, Bundy
    Mobini, Sirous
    Oztop, Pinar
    Nunn, Samantha
    [J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2014, 38 (06) : 634 - 639
  • [3] Cognitive Bias Modification of Attention is Less Effective Under Working Memory Load
    Robert W. Booth
    Bundy Mackintosh
    Sirous Mobini
    Pinar Oztop
    Samantha Nunn
    [J]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2014, 38 : 634 - 639
  • [4] Training the removal of negative information from working memory: A preliminary investigation of a working memory bias modification task
    Robinaugh, Donald J.
    Crane, Margaret E.
    Enock, Philip M.
    McNally, Richard J.
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2016, 30 (03) : 570 - 581
  • [5] Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory
    Bao, Min
    Li, Zhi-Hao
    Zhang, Da-Ren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (05) : 959 - 969
  • [6] The Effect of Working Memory Training and Attention Training on Pupils' Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory
    Zhong, Chongjian
    Xu, Zhan
    [J]. CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL HARMONY (CPSH2011), 2011, : 35 - 39
  • [7] Estradiol facilitates performance as working memory load increases
    Bimonte, HA
    Denenberg, VH
    [J]. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999, 24 (02) : 161 - 173
  • [8] Temporal attention is not affected by working memory load
    Zanto, Theodore P.
    Liu, Helen
    Pan, Peter
    Gazzaley, Adam
    [J]. CORTEX, 2020, 130 : 351 - 361
  • [9] Selective attention load interfered by working memory
    Astrakas, LG
    Zarifi, MK
    Tzika, AA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 484 - 484
  • [10] Attention Bias Modification Training and the New Interventions Research
    March, John S.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 68 (11) : 978 - 979