Revisiting speech acts from the perspective of ritual: A discussion note

被引:5
|
作者
Kadar, Daniel Z. [1 ,2 ]
House, Juliane [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Foreign Languages, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, Res Inst Linguist, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Hamburg Univ, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Hellen Amer Univ, Athens, Greece
关键词
speech act; ritual frames; apology; politeness theory;
D O I
10.1515/multi-2019-0002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The aim of the present academic discussion note is to generate feedback on a recent project that revisits the nature of speech acts as analytic constructs for politeness theory. While speech act has been largely discredited in the field, we believe that they need to be kept in the core of politeness inquiries, in particular if we approach them in combination with other units of analysis. In addition, there are instances in which speech act unavoidably becomes the focal point of research. To discuss this latter notion, we introduce the concept of ritual frame and argue that speech act must be put in the core of an analysis if there is a tension between a ritual frame - an interactional scene in which rights and obligation prevail and the interactants are highly aware of who and where they are - and a particular speech act. As a case study, we examine reflections on an alleged apology in a recent Mixed Martial Arts match.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 692
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysing phatic interaction through speech acts-A discussion note
    House, Juliane
    Kadar, Daniel Z.
    [J]. ACTA LINGUISTICA ACADEMICA, 2022, 69 (03): : 381 - 391
  • [2] Interaction, speech acts and ritual: An integrative model
    House, Juliane
    Kadar, Daniel Z.
    Liu, Fengguang
    Liu, Shiyu
    Shi, Wenrui
    Xia, Zongfeng
    Jiao, Lin
    [J]. LINGUA, 2021, 257
  • [3] Speech acts from the philosophical-linguistic perspective
    Berta, J
    [J]. FILOZOFIA, 2005, 60 (08): : 551 - 572
  • [4] SPEECH ACTS IN GUYANA - COMMUNICATING RITUAL AND PERSONAL INSULTS
    EDWARDS, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BLACK STUDIES, 1979, 10 (01) : 20 - 39
  • [5] METACOMMUNICATION AND DISCUSSION + RULE MECHANISM OF SPEECH ACTS
    PINXT, S
    [J]. DEUTSCHE SPRACHE, 1985, 13 (04): : 289 - 305
  • [6] Comprehensive Analysis of Discussion Forum Participation: From Speech Acts to Discussion Dynamics and Course Outcomes
    Joksimovic, Srecko
    Jovanovic, Jelena
    Kovanovic, Vitomir
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Milikic, Nikola
    Zouaq, Amal
    Van Staalduinen, Jan Paul
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 13 (01): : 38 - 51
  • [7] Multiple-conclusion Logical Consequence: from a Perspective of Speech Acts
    LIANG, Fei
    [J]. UNIVERSITAS-MONTHLY REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE, 2022, 49 (05): : 89 - 104
  • [8] Speech Acts of the Buddha: Sovereign Ritual and the Poetics of Power in Mahayana Sutras
    Gummer, Natalie
    [J]. HISTORY OF RELIGIONS, 2021, 61 (02) : 173 - 211
  • [9] Indirectness in legal speech acts: An argument against the Out of Ritual hypothesis
    Collins, Daniel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2009, 41 (03) : 427 - 439
  • [10] Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion
    Visser, Jacky
    [J]. ARGUMENTATION, 2017, 31 (02) : 245 - 266