Positive Predictive Value of ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for COVID-19

被引:23
|
作者
Bodilsen, Jacob [1 ]
Leth, Steffen [2 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Stig Lonberg [4 ,5 ]
Holler, Jon Gitz [6 ]
Benfield, Thomas [7 ]
Omland, Lars Haukali [8 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Mollepk Vej 4, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp Skejby, Dept Infect Dis, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Reg Hosp Unit West Jutland, Dept Med, Herning, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit Infect Dis, Odense, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
[6] Hillerod Hosp, Dept Pulm & Infect Dis, Hillerod, Denmark
[7] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Dept Infect Dis, Hvidovre, Denmark
[8] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Infect Dis, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2021年 / 13卷
关键词
Coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diagnosis codes; ICD-10; positive predictive value; PPV; validation; epidemiology; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH; DANISH; DATABASES; QUALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2147/CLEP.S309840
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the positive predictive value (PPV) of International Classification version 10 (ICD-10) diagnosis codes for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients and Methods: Medical record review of all patients assigned a diagnosis code of COVID-19 (DB342A or DB972A) at six Danish departments of infectious diseases from February 27 through May 4, 2020. Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis was defined as either: 1) definite, a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on a respiratory sample combined with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19: 2) probable, clinical presentation of COVID-19 without detection of SARSCoV-2 and no alternative diagnoses considered more likely; or 3) possible, clinical presentation of COVID-19 without detection of SARS-CoV-2, and the patient was discharged or deceased before further investigations were carried out. We computed the PPV with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the number of patients with confirmed (i.e., definite, probable, and possible) COVID-19 divided by the number of patients assigned a diagnosis code for COVID-19. Results: The study included 710 patients with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range [IQR] 47-74) and 285/710 (40%) were female. COVID-19 was confirmed in 706/710 (99%) with 705/710 (99%) categorized as definite, 1/710 (0.1%) as probable, and 0 patients as possible COVID-19. The diagnosis was disproven in 4/710 (0.6%) patients who were hospitalized due to bacterial pneumonia (n = 2), influenza (n = 1), and urinary tract infection (n = 1). The overall PPV for COVID-19 was 99% (95% CI 99-100) and remained consistently high among all subgroups including sex, age groups, calendar period, and stratified by diagnosis code and department of infectious diseases (range 97-100%). Conclusion: The overall PPV of diagnosis codes for COVID-19 in Denmark was high and may be suitable for future registry-based prognosis studies of COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 372
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Positive Predictive Value of COVID-19 ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes Across Calendar Time and Clinical Setting
    Lynch, Kristine E.
    Viernes, Benjamin
    Gatsby, Elise
    DuVall, Scott L.
    Jones, Barbara E.
    Box, Tamara L.
    Kreisler, Craig
    Jones, Makoto
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 13 : 1011 - 1018
  • [2] Positive Predictive Value of the ICD-10 Diagnosis Code for Long-COVID
    Duerlund, Laerke Storgaard
    Shakar, Shakil
    Nielsen, Henrik
    Bodilsen, Jacob
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 14 : 141 - 148
  • [3] Positive predictive value of ICD-10 diagnosis codes for brain abscess in the Danish National Patient Registry
    Bodilsen, Jacob
    Dalager-Pedersen, Michael
    Kjaergaard, Nicolai
    van de Beek, Diederik
    Brouwer, Matthijs C.
    Nielsen, Henrik
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 10 : 1503 - 1508
  • [4] Positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes to detect anaphylaxis due to vaccination: A validation study
    Mesfin, Yonatan Moges
    Cheng, Allen C.
    Tran, Aimy H. L.
    Buttery, Jim
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 (10) : 1353 - 1360
  • [5] Accuracy of ICD-10 Diagnostic Codes to Identify COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Patients
    Bhatt, Ankeet S.
    McElrath, Erin E.
    Claggett, Brian L.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Adler, Dale S.
    Solomon, Scott D.
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (08) : 2532 - 2535
  • [6] Positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes for placenta accreta syndrome: a single center validation study
    Jotwani, Anjali R.
    Leonard, Stephanie A.
    Butwick, Alexander
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S523 - S524
  • [7] Accuracy of ICD-10 Diagnostic Codes to Identify COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Patients
    Ankeet S. Bhatt
    Erin E. McElrath
    Brian L. Claggett
    Deepak L. Bhatt
    Dale S. Adler
    Scott D. Solomon
    Muthiah Vaduganathan
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 2532 - 2535
  • [8] Positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: a validation study at a single center
    Takashi Ando
    Nobuhiro Ooba
    Mayumi Mochizuki
    Daisuke Koide
    Koichi Kimura
    Seitetz L. Lee
    Soko Setoguchi
    Kiyoshi Kubota
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [9] Positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: a validation study at a single center
    Ando, Takashi
    Ooba, Nobuhiro
    Mochizuki, Mayumi
    Koide, Daisuke
    Kimura, Koichi
    Lee, Seitetz L.
    Setoguchi, Soko
    Kubota, Kiyoshi
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [10] Analysis of ICD-10 diagnosis codes of patients with hypereosinophilia
    Civelek, E.
    Celik, Kulhas, I
    Buyuktiryaki, B.
    Misirlioglu, Dibek E.
    Toyran, M.
    Ginis, T.
    Metin, A.
    Kocabas, C.
    ALLERGY, 2017, 72 : 540 - 541