Reliability and criterion-related validity testing (construct) of the Endotracheal Suction Assessment Tool (ESAT©)

被引:7
|
作者
Davies, Kylie [1 ,2 ]
Bulsara, Max K. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie [9 ]
Monterosso, Leanne [10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Paediat Intens Care Unit, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Inst Hlth & Rehabil Res, Biostat, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Inst Hlth & Rehabil Res, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Biostat, Crawley, WA, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Crawley, WA, Australia
[7] UCL, Biostat, London, England
[8] UCL, London, England
[9] Univ Lausanne, Fac Biol & Med, Inst Higher Educ & Res Healthcare, Lausanne, Switzerland
[10] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Nursing, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[11] St John God Murdoch Hosp, Nursing, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[12] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Nursing, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
clinical indicators; endotracheal tube suction; nurses; paediatric intensive care; reliability; validity; DECISION-MAKING; GRADUATE NURSES; COMPETENCE; CARE; SIMULATION; EDUCATION; NOVICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.14269
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectivesTo establish criterion-related construct validity and test-retest reliability for the Endotracheal Suction Assessment Tool (c) (ESAT (c)). BackgroundEndotracheal tube suction performed in children can significantly affect clinical stability. Previously identified clinical indicators for endotracheal tube suction were used as criteria when designing the ESAT (c). Content validity was reported previously. The final stages of psychometric testing are presented. DesignObservational testing was used to measure construct validity and determine whether the ESAT (c) could guide inexperienced paediatric intensive care nurses' decision-making regarding endotracheal tube suction. Test-retest reliability of the ESAT (c) was performed at two time points. MethodsThe researchers and paediatric intensive care nurse experts developed 10 hypothetical clinical scenarios with predetermined endotracheal tube suction outcomes. Experienced (n=12) and inexperienced (n=14) paediatric intensive care nurses were presented with the scenarios and the ESAT (c) guiding decision-making about whether to perform endotracheal tube suction for each scenario. Outcomes were compared with those predetermined by the experts (n=9). Test-retest reliability of the ESAT (c) was measured at two consecutive time points (4weeks apart) with experienced and inexperienced paediatric intensive care nurses using the same scenarios and tool to guide decision-making. ResultsNo differences were observed between endotracheal tube suction decisions made by experts (n=9), inexperienced (n=14) and experienced (n=12) nurses confirming the tool's construct validity. No differences were observed between groups for endotracheal tube suction decisions at T1 and T2. ConclusionCriterion-related construct validity and test-retest reliability of the ESAT (c) were demonstrated. Further testing is recommended to confirm reliability in the clinical setting with the inexperienced nurse to guide decision-making related to endotracheal tube suction. Relevance to clinical practiceThe ESAT (c) is the first validated tool to systematically guide endotracheal nursing practice for the inexperienced nurse.
引用
收藏
页码:1891 / 1900
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CRITERION-RELATED CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY
    ROSENBAUM, PR
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1989, 54 (04) : 625 - 633
  • [2] Content validity testing of the ESAT(C) : A decision aid tool for performing endotracheal suction in children
    Davies, Kylie
    Bulsara, Max K.
    Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
    Monterosso, Leanne
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 31 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [3] A Review of the Content, Criterion-Related, and Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Exercises
    Hoffman, Brian J.
    Kennedy, Colby L.
    LoPilato, Alexander C.
    Monahan, Elizabeth L.
    Lance, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 100 (04) : 1143 - 1168
  • [4] THE INTERACTION ANXIOUSNESS SCALE - CONSTRUCT AND CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY
    LEARY, MR
    KOWALSKI, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1993, 61 (01) : 136 - 146
  • [5] CONSTRUCT AND CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY OF THE MICROCOMPUTER-EVALUATION-SCREENING-AND-ASSESSMENT (MESA)
    JANIKOWSKI, TP
    [J]. FOURTH NATIONAL FORUM ON ISSUES IN VOCATIONAL ASSESSMENT: THE ISSUES PAPERS, 1989, : 225 - 229
  • [6] EVIDENCE OF CONSTRUCT AND CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY FOR SELF-CONCEPT
    LUDWIG, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 80 (02): : 213 - &
  • [7] Workplace Goal Orientation Construct and Criterion-Related Validity at Work
    Theis, Leonie
    Bipp, Tanja
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 36 (02) : 399 - 409
  • [8] Transparency in structured interviews:: Consequences for construct and criterion-related validity
    Klehe, Ute-Christine
    Koenig, Cornelius J.
    Richter, Gerald M.
    Kleinmann, Martin
    Melchers, Klaus G.
    [J]. HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2008, 21 (02) : 107 - 137
  • [9] Reliability, construct and criterion-related validity of the Serbian adaptation of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue)
    Marjanovic, Zorana Jolic
    Dimitrijevic, Ana Altaras
    [J]. PSIHOLOGIJA, 2014, 47 (02) : 249 - 262
  • [10] Reliability and Criterion-Related Validity of the Seated Posture Scale
    Barks, Lelia
    Garvan, Cynthia
    Crane, Barbara
    Peterson, Matthew
    Brown, Lisa M.
    Powell-Cope, Gail
    [J]. REHABILITATION NURSING, 2019, 44 (04) : 213 - 220