Exploring social-ecological trade-offs in fisheries using a coupled food web and human behavior model

被引:6
|
作者
Innes-Gold, Anne A. [1 ]
Pavlowich, Tyler [2 ]
Heinichen, Margaret [3 ]
McManus, M. Conor [4 ]
McNamee, Jason [5 ]
Collie, Jeremy [3 ]
Humphries, Austin T. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Fisheries Anim & Vet Sci, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
[2] AIS Inc, Northeast Fisheries Sci Ctr, Narragansett, RI USA
[3] Univ Rhode Isl, Grad Sch Oceanog, Narragansett, RI 02882 USA
[4] Rhode Isl Dept Environm Management, Div Marine Fisheries, Jamestown, RI USA
[5] Bur Nat Resources, Rhode Isl Dept Environm Management, Providence, RI USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2021年 / 26卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
agent-based model; Ecopath with Ecosim; ecosystem-based fisheries management; estuary; forage fish; social-ecological system; AGENT-BASED MODEL; UNIT-EFFORT; NARRAGANSETT BAY; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; STRUCTURAL-CHANGES; HUMAN DIMENSIONS; FORAGE FISH; CATCH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5751/ES-12451-260240
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Marine fisheries represent a social-ecological system driven by both complex ecological processes and human interactions. Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires an understanding of both the biological and social components, and management failure can occur when either are excluded. Despite the significance of both, most research has focused on characterizing biological uncertainty rather than on better understanding the impacts of human behavior because of the difficulty of incorporating human behavior into simulation models. In this study, we use the fisheries in Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA) as a case study to demonstrate how coupled modeling can be used to represent interactions between the food web and fishers in a social-ecological system. Narragansett Bay holds both a commercial fishery for forage fish, i.e., Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) and a recreational fishery for their predators, i.e. striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix). To explore trade-offs between these two fisheries, we created a food web model and then coupled it to a recreational fishers' behavior model, creating a dynamic social-ecological representation of the ecosystem. Fish biomass was projected until 2030 in both the stand-alone food web model and the coupled social-ecological model, with results highlighting how the incorporation of fisher behavior in modeling can lead to changes in the ecosystem. We examined how model outputs varied in response to three attributes: (1) the forage fish commercial harvest scenario, (2) the predatory (piscivorous) fish abundance-catch relationship in the recreational fishery, and (3) the rate at which recreational fishers become discouraged (termed "satisfaction loss"). Higher commercial harvest of forage fish led to lower piscivorous fish biomass but had minimal effects on the number of piscivorous fish caught recreationally or recreational fisher satisfaction. Both the abundancecatch relationship and satisfaction loss rate had notable effects on the fish biomass, the number of fish caught recreationally, and recreational fisher satisfaction. Currently, the lack of spatial and location-specific fisher behavior data limits the predictive use of our model. However, our modeling framework shows that fisher behavior can be successfully incorporated into a coupled social-ecological model through the use of agent-based modeling, and our results highlight that its inclusion can influence ecosystem dynamics. Because fisher decision making and the ecosystem can influence one another, social responses to changing ecosystems should be explicitly integrated into ecosystem modeling to improve ecosystem-based fisheries management efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Ocean Acidification May Aggravate Social-Ecological Trade-Offs in Coastal Fisheries
    Voss, Rudi
    Quaas, Martin F.
    Schmidt, Joern O.
    Kapaun, Ute
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [2] Navigating trade-offs in the social-ecological systems
    Lu, Nan
    Liu, Lue
    Yu, Dandan
    Fu, Bojie
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 48 : 77 - 84
  • [3] Learning about social-ecological trade-offs
    Galafassi, Diego
    Daw, Tim M.
    Munyi, Lydiah
    Brown, Katrina
    Barnaud, Cecile
    Fazey, Ioan
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (01):
  • [4] Exploring social-ecological impacts on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Peng, Jian
    Luo, Yuhang
    Qiu, Sijing
    Dong, Jianquan
    Zhang, Zimo
    Vercruysse, Kim
    Grabowski, Robert C.
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 197
  • [5] Resilience-performance trade-offs in managing social-ecological systems
    Homayounfar, Mehran
    Muneepeerakul, Rachata
    Anderies, John M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 27 (01):
  • [6] Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system
    Hamilton, M.
    Salerno, J.
    Fischer, A. P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (12)
  • [7] Fisheries and Tourism: Social, Economic, and Ecological Trade-offs in Coral Reef Systems
    Lachs, Liam
    Onate-Casado, Javier
    [J]. YOUMARES 9 - THE OCEANS: OUR RESEARCH, OUR FUTURE, 2020, : 243 - 260
  • [8] Looking to the past to shape the future: addressing social-ecological change and adaptive trade-offs
    Colin Grier
    Lilian Alessa
    Andrew Kliskey
    [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2017, 17 : 1205 - 1215
  • [9] Simulating benefits, costs and trade-offs of spatial management in marine social-ecological systems
    Ovando, Daniel
    Bradley, Darcy
    Burns, Echelle
    Thomas, Lennon
    Thorson, James
    [J]. FISH AND FISHERIES, 2024, 25 (02) : 218 - 234
  • [10] Climate change alters social-ecological trade-offs in achieving ocean futures' targets
    Zeng, Zeyu
    Lam, Vicky W. Y.
    Sumaila, U. Rashid
    Cheung, William W. L.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (08)