Angiotensin Receptor Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients with Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Ma, Haotian [1 ]
Jiang, Hongcheng [2 ]
Feng, Jing [3 ]
Gan, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Clin Sch 1, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Div Cardiol,Dept Internal Med, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med & Hlth Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
END-POINT REDUCTION; LOSARTAN INTERVENTION; TELMISARTAN; ANTAGONIST; EVENTS; TRIAL; INHIBITION; IRBESARTAN; MORTALITY; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1155/2021/6628469
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common serious cardiac rhythm disturbances and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in general population. Hypertension is the most prevalent and potentially modifiable risk factor for AF. This study is aimed at evaluating the effect of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or calcium channel blocker (CCB) on AF recurrence among patients with hypertension and AF. Methods. The PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Collaboration of Controlled Clinical Trials registry databases were searched from their inception to September 2020. Results. A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 1495 patients were included in our study. This finding showed that ARB had a statistically significant superiority in preventing AF recurrence (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30-0.72, P = 0.0006) and persistent AF (OR 0.41, 95% Cl: 0.24-0.71, P = 0.001) compared to CCB. Subgroup analysis showed that there was a significant difference in telmisartan subgroup (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.23-1.29, P = 0.17) and nontelmisartan subgroup (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.77, P = 0.005). Subgroup analysis indicated that nifedipine subgroup did not show a statistically significant difference on AF recurrence between ARB and CCB (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.46-1.68, P = 0.69), but amlodipine subgroup showed that ARB had a significant superiority in prevention of AF recurrence (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.27-0.56, P < 0.0001) compared with CCB. Conclusions. This study suggests that ARB is superior to CCB for preventing the AF recurrence and persistent AF among patients with hypertension and AF.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose Timing of an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker/Calcium Channel Blocker Combination in Hypertensive Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
    Kario, Kazuomi
    Hoshide, Satoshi
    Uchiyama, Kazuaki
    Yoshida, Tetsuro
    Okazaki, Osamu
    Noshiro, Takao
    Aoki, Hirotaka
    Mizuno, Hiroyuki
    Matsumoto, Yuri
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2016, 18 (10): : 1036 - 1044
  • [2] Calcium Channel Blocker Compared With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker for Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wu, Ling
    Deng, Song-Bai
    She, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2014, 16 (11): : 838 - 845
  • [3] Efficacy of SacubitrilValsartan Compared With AngiotensinConverting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lucena, Larissa A.
    Freitas, Marcos
    Guida, Camila
    Souza, Ana C.
    de Sousa, Julio Cesar V.
    Maia, Ferdinand Gilbert Saraiva da Silva
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [4] β-blocker therapy in atrial fibrillation
    Grönefeld, GC
    Hohnloser, SH
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (07): : 1607 - 1612
  • [5] Beta-blocker versus non beta-blocker therapy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation onset in hypertension: a meta-analysis
    Nasr, I. Abi
    Mansencal, N.
    Bouzamondo, A.
    Hulot, J. S.
    Dubourg, O.
    Le Heuzey, J. Y.
    Lechat, P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 870 - 871
  • [6] Mechanism of termination of atrial fibrillation by Na channel blocker
    Yoshiga, Y
    Shimizu, A
    Yamagata, T
    Esato, M
    Ueyama, T
    Ohmura, M
    Itagaki, K
    Kimura, M
    Kakugawa, H
    Matsuzaki, M
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 329 - 329
  • [7] The beneficial effects of beta-blocker and calcium-channel blocker on atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure
    Tamaki, S
    Yamada, T
    Mine, T
    Morita, T
    Kioka, H
    Tsukamoto, Y
    Masuda, M
    Okuda, K
    Fukunami, M
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (09) : S295 - S295
  • [8] Randomized trial of angiotensin II-receptor blocker vs. dihydropiridine calcium channel blocker in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with hypertension (J-RHYTHM II Study)
    Yamashita, Takeshi
    Inoue, Hiroshi
    Okumura, Ken
    Kodama, Itsuo
    Aizawa, Yoshifusa
    Atarashi, Hirotsugu
    Ohe, Tohru
    Ohtsu, Hiroshi
    Kato, Takao
    Kamakura, Shiro
    Kumagai, Koichiro
    Kurachi, Yoshihisa
    Koretsune, Yukihiro
    Saikawa, Tetsunori
    Sakurai, Masayuki
    Sato, Toshiaki
    Sugi, Kaoru
    Nakaya, Haruaki
    Hirai, Makoto
    Hirayama, Atsushi
    Fukatani, Masahiko
    Mitamura, Hideo
    Yamazaki, Tsutomu
    Watanabe, Eiichi
    Ogawa, Satoshi
    EUROPACE, 2011, 13 (04): : 473 - 479
  • [9] Inefficacy of a Highly Selective T-Type Calcium Channel Blocker in Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Related Remodeling
    Kato, Takeshi
    Iwasaki, Yu-Ki
    Duker, Goran
    Fjellstrom, Ola
    Giordanetto, Fabrizio
    Sundqvist, Monika
    Wallin, Anita
    Wang, Qing-Dong
    Nattel, Stanley
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (05) : 531 - 536
  • [10] Perioperative Beta-Blocker for Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Sue Hyun
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Hwang, Ho Young
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2021, 69 (02): : 133 - 140