Watershed-scale AMC selection for hydrologic modeling

被引:2
|
作者
Bhuyan, SJ
Mankin, KR
Koelliker, JK
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Arizona Dept Environm Qual, Phoenix, AZ USA
来源
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE | 2003年 / 46卷 / 02期
关键词
AGNPS; CN method; soil moisture; watershed modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The Natural Resources Conservation Service curve-number (CN) method commonly uses three discrete levels (1, 2, and 3) of antecedent moisture condition (AMC) to describe soil moisture at the time of a runoff event. However, this may not adequately represent soil water conditions for watershed modeling purposes. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of individual-event watershed-scale AMC values to adjust field-scale CN, and to assess which hydrologic parameters would provide the best estimate of individual-event AMC. Landsat Thematic Mapper images from 1997 and 1998 were used to obtain 10 landcover classes for Red Rock Creek watershed, Kansas. The canopy growth of crops was used to provide temporal adjustment of CNs in the watershed. Stream-flow data for 1997-1999 was collected from a U.S. Geological Survey gaging station near the watershed outlet, and base flow was separated to obtain surface-runoff amounts. Watershed-average AMC factors were estimated from measured rainfall and surface runoff amounts for each of 23 events and used to adjust CNs in the AGNPS watershed model. For individual runoff events, calibration was achieved with AMCs that averaged 1.5 and ranged from 0.9 to 2.4. Therefore, an AMC of 2, as used in many hydrologic models, would overestimate the surface runoff amounts in this sub-humid Kansas watershed. Generally, AMC increased with 5-day antecedent rainfall above 5 mm. Soil moisture and 5-day antecedent rain were found to be significantly correlated to AMC.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 310
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incorporating Wetland Delineation and Impacts in Watershed-Scale Hydrologic Modeling
    Qi, Tiansong
    Khanaum, Mosammat Mustari
    Boutin, Kyle
    Otte, Marinus L.
    Lin, Zhulu
    Chu, Xuefeng
    WATER, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [2] Hydrologic components of watershed-scale models
    Migliaccio, Kati W.
    Srivastava, P.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (05) : 1695 - 1703
  • [3] Hydrologic components of watershed-scale models
    Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Homestead, FL, United States
    不详
    不详
    Trans. ASABE, 2007, 5 (1695-1703):
  • [4] Integrating depression storages and their spatial distribution in watershed-scale hydrologic modeling
    Zeng, Lan
    Chu, Xuefeng
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 151
  • [5] Ensemble modeling of watershed-scale hydrologic effects of short-rotation woody crop production
    Vache, Kellie
    Meles, Menberu Bitew
    Griffiths, Natalie A.
    Jackson, C. Rhett
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2021, 15 (05): : 1345 - 1359
  • [6] Modeling the hydrologic effects of watershed-scale green roof implementation in the Pacific Northwest, United States
    Barnhart, Brad
    Pettus, Paul
    Halama, Jonathan
    McKane, Robert
    Mayer, Paul
    Djang, Kevin
    Brookes, Allen
    Moskal, L. Monika
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 277
  • [7] Watershed-scale monitoring and modeling of pesticides in Belgium
    Seuntjens, Piet
    Joris, Ingeborg
    Desmet, Nele
    Boenne, Wesley
    Bronders, Jan
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [8] Effects of Design and Climate on Bioretention Effectiveness for Watershed-Scale Hydrologic Benefits
    Lammers, Roderick W.
    Miller, Laura
    Bledsoe, Brian P.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE WATER IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (04)
  • [9] An improved representation of geographically isolated wetlands in a watershed-scale hydrologic model
    Evenson, Grey R.
    Golden, Heather E.
    Lane, Charles R.
    D'Amico, Ellen
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2016, 30 (22) : 4168 - 4184
  • [10] Unit source area data: Can it make a difference in calibrating the hydrologic response for watershed-scale modeling?
    Van Liew, M. W.
    Green, C. H.
    Starks, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2007, 62 (03) : 162 - 170