Hip Fractures in Elderly People: Surgery or No Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:57
|
作者
van de Ree, Cornelis L. P. [1 ]
De Jongh, Mariska A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Peeters, Charles M. M. [3 ]
de Munter, Leonie [1 ]
Roukema, Jan. A. [1 ,4 ]
Gosens, Taco [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Elisabeth TweeSteden Hosp, Dept Trauma TopCare, Hilvarenbeekse Weg 60, NL-5022 GC Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Network Emergency Care Brabant, Brabant Trauma Registry, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Elisabeth TweeSteden Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Univ, Ctr Psychol Somat Dis, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
hip fracture; (non)operative treatment; elderly; mortality; quality of life; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; OLDER; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; TRIAL; INDEX; AGE;
D O I
10.1177/2151458517713821
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction: Increasing numbers of patients with hip fractures also have advanced comorbidities. A majority are treated surgically. However, a significantly increasing percentage of medically unfit patients with unacceptably high risk of perioperative death are treated nonoperatively. Important questions about patients' prefracture quality of life (QOL) and future perspectives should be asked before considering different treatment options to assess what kind of treatment is advisable in frail elderly high-risk patients with a hip fracture. Objective: The aim of this review was to provide an overview of differences in mortality, health-related QOL [(HR)QOL], functional outcome, and costs between nonoperative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) of hip fractures in patients above 65 years. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in EMBASE, OvidSP, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science for observational studies and trials. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing NOM with OM in hip fracture patients were selected. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed according to the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) or Furlan checklist. Results: Seven observational studies were included with a total of 1189 patients, of whom 242 (20.3%) were treated conservatively. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate (mean: 14.7, standard deviation [SD]: 1.5). The 30-day and 1-year mortalities were higher in the nonoperative group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-10.96; OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.57-9.41). None of the included studies compared QOL, functional outcome, or health-care costs between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that only a few studies with small number of patients comparing NOM with OM were published. A significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality was revealed in nonoperatively treated hip fracture patients. No data were found examining (HR)QOL and costs. Further work is needed to enable shared decision-making and to initiate NOM in frail elderly patients with advanced comorbidity and limited life expectancy.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 180
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate versus delayed surgery for hip fractures in the elderly patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thomas Klestil
    Christoph Röder
    Christoph Stotter
    Birgit Winkler
    Stefan Nehrer
    Martin Lutz
    Irma Klerings
    Gernot Wagner
    Gerald Gartlehner
    Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [2] Immediate versus delayed surgery for hip fractures in the elderly patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Klestil, Thomas
    Roeder, Christoph
    Stotter, Christoph
    Winkler, Birgit
    Nehrer, Stefan
    Lutz, Martin
    Klerings, Irma
    Wagner, Gernot
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [3] Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song-yang Liu
    Ci Li
    Pei-xun Zhang
    [J]. Perioperative Medicine, 10
  • [4] Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Song-yang
    Li, Ci
    Zhang, Pei-xun
    [J]. PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [5] Hip fractures in elderly people: Always perform an operation? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van de Ree, Cornelis L.
    de Jongh, Mariska
    Peeters, Charles M.
    de Munter, Leonie
    Roukema, Jan A.
    Gosens, Taco
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 44 - 44
  • [6] Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Klestil, Thomas
    Roeder, Christoph
    Stotter, Christoph
    Winkler, Birgit
    Nehrer, Stefan
    Lutz, Martin
    Klerings, Irma
    Wagner, Gernot
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [7] Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thomas Klestil
    Christoph Röder
    Christoph Stotter
    Birgit Winkler
    Stefan Nehrer
    Martin Lutz
    Irma Klerings
    Gernot Wagner
    Gerald Gartlehner
    Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [8] Does early surgery improve outcomes for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Farrow, L.
    Ablett, A. D.
    Sargeant, H. W.
    Smith, T. O.
    Johnston, A. T.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (08) : 1393 - 1400
  • [9] Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on the Prognosis of Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhu, Ruiqi
    Yang, Fengqiao
    Li, Caiying
    Zhu, Hongxia
    Lin, Lu
    Zhao, Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA NURSING, 2023, 30 (05) : 271 - 281
  • [10] Effects of Frailty on Outcomes Following Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Yan
    Wang, Ansu
    Lou, Yijiao
    Peng, Daojuan
    Jiang, Zhongyan
    Xia, Tongxia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9