Uncertainty analysis of cutting parameters during grinding based on RSM optimization and Monte Carlo simulation

被引:4
|
作者
Kahraman, Mehmet Fatih [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ozturk, Sabri [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Golkoy Campus, TR-14280 Bolu, Turkey
[2] Kocaeli Univ, Kocaeli, Turkey
[3] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Bolu, Turkey
[4] TOBB Univ, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Sakarya Univ, Mech Engn, Sakarya, Turkey
[6] Yildiz Tech Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[7] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Bolu, Turkey
关键词
Flat glass; grinding wheel; multi non-linear regression; response surface optimization; Monte Carlo simulation; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; FLAT GLASS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3139/120.111443
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Due to the importance of high surface quality of machined parts, regarding its functional requirements, it is necessary to determine an appropriate set of grinding parameters. According to the uncertainty of the machining process, the statistical techniques have recently been used to set up an experimental-based model for estimating the performance of machining parameters and optimizing them. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the modeling and optimization of the grinding process using three approaches. First, multi non-linear regression (MNLR) based on central composite design (CCD) was used to determine the process model. Then the grinding parameters were optimized considering response surface methodology (RSM). Finally, the probabilistic uncertainty analysis was applied by using Monte Carlo simulation as a function of wheel speed and feed rate.. The surface roughness value, which was named the response variable, was estimated by fitting the MNLR model with a predicted regression coefficient (R-pred(2)) of 84.69 %. Wheel speed of 4205.6 rpm and feed rate of 2.969 mm x min(-1) were calculated as RSM-optimized conditions with a surface roughness of 2.26326 mu m. The verification experiments were performed with three replications to verify the predicted surface roughness value obtained with the derived model, and 2.263 +/- 2 % mu m of surface roughness was calculated using RSM optimized conditions. Monte Carlo simulations were found to be quite effective for identification of the uncertainties in surface roughness that could not be identified by deterministic ways.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1219
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling and optimization of machining parameters during grinding of flat glass using response surface methodology and probabilistic uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation
    Ozturk, Sabri
    Kahraman, Mehmet Fatih
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2019, 145 : 274 - 291
  • [2] Monte Carlo simulation of particle breakage process during grinding
    Mishra, BK
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 110 (03) : 246 - 252
  • [3] Uncertainty analysis of milling parameters using Monte Carlo simulation, the Taguchi optimization method and data-driven modeling
    Kahraman, Mehmet Faith
    Bilge, Habibullah
    Ozturk, Sabri
    [J]. MATERIALS TESTING, 2019, 61 (05) : 477 - 483
  • [4] Topological analysis in Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty propagation
    Pakyuz-Charrier, Evren
    Jessell, Mark
    Giraud, Jeremie
    Lindsay, Mark
    Ogarko, Vitaliy
    [J]. SOLID EARTH, 2019, 10 (05) : 1663 - 1684
  • [5] Beam steering uncertainty analysis for Risley prisms based on Monte Carlo simulation
    Zhang, Hao
    Yuan, Yan
    Su, Lijuan
    Huang, Fengzhen
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 56 (01)
  • [6] Monte Carlo simulation of nanometric cutting
    Komanduri, R
    Narulkar, R
    Raff, LM
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 2004, 84 (11) : 1155 - 1183
  • [7] The Optimization Analysis of Equipment Maintenance based on Monte-Carlo Simulation
    Geng, DAi
    Zhang, Shimin
    Wang, Deguo
    Gao, Jian
    Dai, Lisha
    [J]. MANUFACTURING PROCESS TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-5, 2011, 189-193 : 424 - 427
  • [8] Monte Carlo Simulation of Influence of Input Parameters Uncertainty on Output Data
    Sobek, Lukas
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2009, 1204 : 157 - 158
  • [9] MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION AND GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION WITHOUT PARAMETERS
    HESSELBO, B
    STINCHCOMBE, RB
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 74 (12) : 2151 - 2155
  • [10] Monte Carlo vs. Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis
    Kim, Young-Jin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):