An alternative efficient representation of demand-based competitive asymmetry

被引:17
|
作者
DeSarbo, Wayne S. [1 ]
Grewal, Rajdeep [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
competitive market structure; asymmetric competition; multidimensional scaling; positioning; consideration/choice sets;
D O I
10.1002/smj.601
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Competitive asymmetry is defined in terms of the directional level of competition among brands/firms (i.e., unit of analysis), where the degree to which brand/firm A may compete with brand/firm B does not equal the degree to which brand/firm B competes with brand/firm A. Such a market structure phenomenon is quite commonplace in virtually every market, e.g., where there exists distinct market leaders and followers. DeSarbo, Grewal, and Wind recently (2006) proposed a new spatial methodology in SMJ to assess these competitive asymmetries based on information on consumer choice sets (i.e., a demand-based approach). However, the approach espoused by DeSarbo et al. results in as many competi. it. ve maps as there are brands/firms in a dataset. In this research, the authors devise a distance-based unfolding multidimensional scaling procedure for deriving joint spaces of brands/firms both as givers and takers of consumer consideration with the objective to have a more efficient representation of competitive asymmetries (i.e., one map irrespective of the number of brands/firms under study). An application is provided for an actual commercial study undertaken by a major U.S. automobile manufacturer examining the mid-size car marketplace. The strategic implications of the results are detailed. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 766
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage
    Adner, R
    Zemsky, P
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (03) : 215 - 239
  • [2] Market orientation, competitive advantage, and performance: A demand-based perspective
    Zhou, Kevin Zheng
    Brown, James R.
    Dev, Chekitan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2009, 62 (11) : 1063 - 1070
  • [3] Ultra-efficient cooling with demand-based control
    Hartman, Thomas
    [J]. HPAC Heating, Piping, AirConditioning Engineering, 2001, 73 (12): : 29 - 32
  • [4] Promoting demand-based pricing
    Ronald B. Larson
    [J]. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2019, 18 : 42 - 51
  • [5] Benchmarking the US physician workforce - An alternative to needs-based or demand-based planning
    Goodman, DC
    Fisher, ES
    Bubolz, TA
    Mohr, JE
    Poage, JF
    Wennberg, JE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (22): : 1811 - 1817
  • [6] Promoting demand-based pricing
    Larson, Ronald B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2019, 18 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [7] Demand-Based Option Pricing
    Garleanu, Nicolae
    Pedersen, Lasse Heje
    Poteshman, Allen M.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (10): : 4259 - 4299
  • [8] A Demand-Based Approach to Menu Pricing
    Kelly, Thomas J.
    Kiefer, Nicholas M.
    Burdett, Kenneth
    [J]. CORNELL HOSPITALITY QUARTERLY, 2009, 50 (03) : 383 - 387
  • [9] Demand-Based Control Design for Efficient Heat Pump Operation of Electric Vehicles
    Dvorak, Dominik
    Basciotti, Daniele
    Gellai, Imre
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (20)
  • [10] DEMAND-BASED INTERVENTIONS FOR LONELY PEOPLE
    Luijkx, K.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 612 - 612