Incorporating Carbon and Bioenergy Concerns Into Forest Management

被引:6
|
作者
Yoshimoto, Atsushi [1 ]
Asante, Patrick [2 ]
Itaka, Shizu [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Stat Math, Dept Stat Modeling, 10-3 Midori Cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 1908562, Japan
[2] Govt British Columbia, Minist Forests Lands Nat Resource Operat & Rural, POB 9515 Stn, Victoria, BC V8W 9C2, Canada
[3] Res Org Informat & Syst, Ctr Social Data Structuring, 10-3 Midori Cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 1908562, Japan
来源
CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS | 2018年 / 4卷 / 03期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Forest carbon sequestration; Bioenergy; Optimization; Forest management; SITE PREPARATION TREATMENTS; FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSTITUTION; LAND-USE CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BOREAL FOREST; SEQUESTRATION BENEFITS; SEQUESTERING CARBON; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; THINNING REGIMES; PROVIDING TIMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s40725-018-0080-9
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The primary focus of this paper is to review articles that incorporate forest carbon sequestration or bioenergy into an optimization framework for forest management at the stand and forest levels and to highlight the gaps in the literature. Forest management is seen as a cost-effective strategy to reduce carbon emission, and optimization techniques are a powerful tool to assist in developing an optimal strategy. Our review of literature shows a gap in research on the use of optimal management schemes to investigate the impact of silvicultural techniques such as site preparation, genetic improvement, and fertilization on carbon sequestration. For operational planning, spatial information is helpful in developing an optimal mitigation strategy. However, there is a gap in literature when it comes to the application of exact solution techniques to solve spatially constrained harvest scheduling problems that encourage carbon sequestration and timber production, while taking into account forest management prescriptions. The review further shows that assessing the impacts of using carbon sequestration and bioenergy strategies to mitigate the impact of greenhouse gas-induced climate change is complex due to the interaction between the forest sector, energy, and other industrial product sectors. We suggest that more research should be directed towards using optimization techniques and an integrated system approach that tracks carbon flow in multiple sectors as a strategy to reduce carbon emissions. This strategy should encourage higher wood utilization and increase use of long-lived harvested wood products as well as bioenergy from waste wood.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 160
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incorporating Carbon and Bioenergy Concerns Into Forest Management
    Atsushi Yoshimoto
    Patrick Asante
    Shizu Itaka
    [J]. Current Forestry Reports, 2018, 4 : 150 - 160
  • [2] Smart forest management boosts both carbon storage and bioenergy
    Peter Högberg
    Tomas Lundmark
    Pekka E. Kauppi
    [J]. Nature, 2023, 613 : 437 - 437
  • [3] Smart forest management boosts both carbon storage and bioenergy
    Hogberg, Peter
    Lundmark, Tomas
    Kauppi, Pekka E.
    [J]. NATURE, 2023, 613 (7944) : 437 - 437
  • [4] Forest bioenergy at the cost of carbon sequestration?
    Vanhala, Pekka
    Repo, Anna
    Liski, Jari
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [5] Carbon sequestration potential of forest land: Management for products and bioenergy versus preservation
    Van Deusen, P.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (12): : 1687 - 1694
  • [6] Carbon balance indicator for forest bioenergy scenarios
    Pingoud, Kim
    Ekholm, Tommi
    Soimakallio, Sampo
    Helin, Tuomas
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01): : 171 - 182
  • [7] Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production
    Mitchell, Stephen R.
    Harmon, Mark E.
    O'Connell, Kari E. B.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2012, 4 (06): : 818 - 827
  • [8] Best management practices for forest bioenergy programs
    Neary, Daniel G.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 2 (06) : 614 - 632
  • [9] Global forest management, carbon sequestration and bioenergy supply under alternative shared socioeconomic pathways
    Daigneault, Adam
    Favero, Alice
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 103
  • [10] To harvest or not to harvest? Forest management as a trade-off between bioenergy production and carbon sink
    Lin, Boqiang
    Ge, Jiamin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 268