Comparing Utilitarian and Hedonic Usefulness to User Intention in Multipurpose Information Systems

被引:38
|
作者
Gu, Ja-Chul [3 ]
Fan, Liu [2 ]
Suh, Yung Ho [2 ]
Lee, Sang-Chul [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Christian Univ, Dept Business Adm, Seoul 157722, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Management, Management Res Inst, Seoul 130701, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Taejon 305701, South Korea
关键词
TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; COGNITIVE ABSORPTION; TAM; CONSUMPTION; EASE; DETERMINANTS; ANTECEDENTS; INVARIANCE;
D O I
10.1089/cyber.2009.0167
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research studies the differences between productivity-oriented (or utilitarian) and entertainment-oriented (or hedonic) usefulness for a multipurpose information system in user acceptance models, as information systems can be high or low in both hedonic and utilitarian attributes. Accordingly, perceived usefulness (PU) is divided into perceived utilitarian usefulness (PUU) and perceived hedonic usefulness (PHU) to provide a better understanding of users' intention for accepting IT. To test the proposed model more effectively, this research targets instant messaging (IM), which is an extremely popular and increasingly important communication system, both utilitarian and hedonic in nature. This research compares the difference across two groups: students for hedonic purpose and employees for utilitarian purpose. We conclude that the proposed model, which distinguishes between utilitarian and hedonic usefulness, is more effective than previous models in which the usefulness was not distinguished. Both PUU and PHU have an effect on intention to use. Employees consider PUU more important in their intention to use IM, while students are more influenced by PHU.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 297
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Balance of Hedonic and Utilitarian Values in Information Systems Use
    Valkonen, Konsta
    Lindstrom, Niklas
    Natunen, Laura
    Isoviita, Riina
    Tuunanen, Tuure
    [J]. NORDIC CONTRIBUTIONS IN IS RESEARCH (SCIS 2015), 2015, 223 : 165 - 176
  • [2] User acceptance of hedonic information systems
    van der Heijden, H
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2004, 28 (04) : 695 - 704
  • [3] Why do users prefer the hedonic but choose the Utilitarian? Investigating user dilemma of hedonic-utilitarian choice
    Kakar, Adarsh Kumar Saiindarlal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2017, 108 : 50 - 61
  • [4] Impacts of Hedonic and Utilitarian User Motives on the Innovativeness of User-Developed Solutions
    Stock, Ruth Maria
    Oliveira, Pedro
    von Hippel, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 32 (03) : 389 - 403
  • [5] Students' Continuance Intention Toward Programming Games: Hedonic and Utilitarian Aspects
    Huang, Yong-Ming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2020, 36 (04) : 393 - 402
  • [6] Hedonic and utilitarian value as a mediator of men's intention to purchase cosmetics
    Ho, Han-Chiang
    Chiu, Candy Lim
    Mansumitrchai, Somkiat
    Quarles, Brian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL FASHION MARKETING, 2020, 11 (01) : 71 - 89
  • [7] Understanding hedonic and utilitarian responses to product reviews on youtube and purchase intention
    Silaban, Pantas H.
    Silalahi, Andri Dayarana K.
    Octoyuda, Edgar
    Sitanggang, Yuni Kartika
    Hutabarat, Lamtiur
    Sitorus, Ade Irma Suryani
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [8] Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage
    Wakefield, Robin L.
    Whitten, Dwayne
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 15 (03) : 292 - 300
  • [9] The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps
    Akdim, Khaoula
    Casalo, Luis, V
    Flavian, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2022, 66
  • [10] The Effects of Utilitarian, Hedonic and Relational Factors on Intention: The Moderating Role of Website Anxiety
    Xu, Jingjun
    [J]. AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,