Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 1. Nutritive value of herbage and livestock performance

被引:67
|
作者
Isselstein, J.
Griffith, B. A.
Pradel, P.
Venerus, S.
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Crop Sci, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Inst Grassland & Environm Res, Okehampton, Devon, England
[3] INRA, Unitee Rech Herbivores, Theix, France
[4] Serv Agr, Pordenone, Italy
关键词
grassland biodiversity; extensive grazing systerns; herbage feeding value; livestock performance;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00571.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Reduction of grazing intensity and the use of traditional instead of commercial breeds has frequently been recommended to meet biodiversity and production goals in sustainable grazing systems in Europe. To test the impact of such practices across a range of contrasting grassland types, integrated measurements of foraging behaviour, agronomic production and botanical, structural and invertebrate biodiversity were made over three years on four sites in the UK, Germany, France and Italy. The sites in the UK and Germany were inesotrophic grassland With high productivity and low to moderate initial levels of plant diversity, and were grazed by cattle. The French site was a semi-natural, species-rich grassland grazed by cattle. The Italian site contained a wider range in plant diversity, from species-rich to rnesotrophic grassland, and was grazed by sheep. The treatments were: MC, moderate grazing intensity with a commercial breed - this was designed to utilize herbage growth for optimum livestock production; LC, lenient grazing intensity with a commercial breed - this was designed to increase biodiversity by not fully utilizing herbage growth; and LT, lenient grazing intensity with a traditional breed - this was also designed to increase biodiversity. Neither fertilizers nor pesticides were applied. The nutritive value of the herbage and the performance of the livestock were measured. Mean stocking rates were proportionately 0-30-0-40 lower and mean sward heights and herbage mass on offer were 0.30-0.50 higher on the LC and LT treatments compared with the MC treatment. The proportion of live and dead material, and leaves and stems in the herbage, its chemical composition and nutritive value were little affected by the treatments. Individual livestock performance, measured as fiveweight gain, showed no consistent response to treatment. In Germany, performance on the MC treatment was slightly lower than on the LC and LT treatments but no such difference was found on the sites in the other countries. Livestock breed did not have a strong effect on livestock performance. In the UK and France the traditional breeds had a lower performance but. this was not the case in Germany or Italy. Livestock performance per ha of the LC and LT treatments was up to 0-40 lower than of the MC treatment. It is concluded that biodiversity-targeted extensive grazing systems have potential to be integrated into intensive livestock production systems because the individual livestock performance reaches a similar level compared to a moderate grazing intensity. Traditional breeds did not have a production advantage over commercial breeds on extensively managed pastures.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 158
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems.: 2.: Diet selection
    Dumont, B.
    Rook, A. J.
    Coran, Ch.
    Roever, K.-U.
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (02) : 159 - 171
  • [2] Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 4. Effects on animal diversity
    Wallis De Vries, M. F.
    Parkinson, A. E.
    Dulphy, J. P.
    Sayer, M.
    Diana, E.
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (02) : 185 - 197
  • [3] Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on grazing systems: 3. Effects on diversity of vegetation
    Scimone, M.
    Rook, A. J.
    Garel, J. P.
    Sahin, N.
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (02) : 172 - 184
  • [4] Effect of livestock breed and grazing intensity on grazing systems: 5. Management and policy implications
    Mills, J.
    Rook, A. J.
    Dumont, B.
    Isselstein, J.
    Scimone, M.
    De Vries, M. F. Wallis
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (04) : 429 - 436
  • [5] Effects of grazing and precipitation on herbage production, herbage nutritive value and performance of sheep in continental steppe
    Schoenbach, P.
    Wan, H.
    Gierus, M.
    Loges, R.
    Mueller, K.
    Lin, L.
    Susenbeth, A.
    Taube, F.
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2012, 67 (04) : 535 - 545
  • [6] Estimating the daily nutritive value of bermudagrass for grazing livestock
    Woli, P.
    Rouquette, F. M., Jr.
    Long, C. R.
    Tedeschi, L. O.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 37 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [7] Mixed Grazing Systems Benefit both Upland Biodiversity and Livestock Production
    Fraser, Mariecia D.
    Moorby, Jon M.
    Vale, James E.
    Evans, Darren M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [8] Effects of grazing livestock on grassland functioning may depend more on grazing intensity than livestock diversity
    Hu, Liang-Jun
    Wang, Weina
    Cheng, Yue
    Guo, Yuhang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (38) : 18762 - 18763
  • [9] Effects of livestock breed and stocking rate on sustainable grazing systems: butterfly diversity and abundance
    WallisDeVries, MF
    Tallowin, JRB
    Dulphy, JP
    Sayer, M
    Diana, E
    [J]. Integrating Efficient Grassland Farming and Biodiversity, 2005, 10 : 227 - 230
  • [10] Effects of grazing frequency on the production, nutritive value, herbage utilisation, and structure of a Paspalum dilatatum sward
    Torales, ATA
    Acosta, GL
    Deregibus, VA
    Moauro, PM
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (04) : 467 - 472